FULT
Price
$17.79
Change
+$0.17 (+0.96%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
72 days until earnings call
NBHC
Price
$36.54
Change
+$0.40 (+1.11%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs NBHC

Header iconFULT vs NBHC Comparison
Open Charts FULT vs NBHCBanner chart's image
Fulton Financial
Price$17.79
Change+$0.17 (+0.96%)
Volume$903.17K
Capitalization3.24B
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS
Price$36.54
Change+$0.40 (+1.11%)
Volume$160.04K
Capitalization1.39B
FULT vs NBHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. NBHC commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and NBHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FULT: $17.79 vs. NBHC: $36.54)
Brand notoriety: FULT and NBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 57% vs. NBHC: 55%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $3.24B vs. NBHC: $1.39B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.24B. NBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FULT and NBHC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.25B) has a higher market cap than NBHC($1.39B). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than FULT: NBHC (11.83) vs FULT (10.46). FULT YTD gains are higher at: -5.862 vs. NBHC (-13.848). FULT has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. NBHC (369M). NBHC has less debt than FULT: NBHC (135M) vs FULT (1.66B). FULT has higher revenues than NBHC: FULT (1.23B) vs NBHC (402M).
FULTNBHCFULT / NBHC
Capitalization3.25B1.39B233%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.862-13.84842%
P/E Ratio10.4611.8388%
Revenue1.23B402M307%
Total Cash389M369M105%
Total Debt1.66B135M1,227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs NBHC: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
NBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3555
SMR RATING
1..100
1220
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (43). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (55). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (20). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (76). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (53). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTNBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICFSX9.790.07
+0.72%
ICON Consumer Select Institutional
WLGAX38.800.25
+0.65%
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund A
PIOTX24.300.14
+0.58%
Victory Pioneer Core Equity A
AIMOX17.86-0.01
-0.06%
AQR International Momentum Style I
ESEAX32.60-0.03
-0.09%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.96%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
HWC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ONB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
UBSI - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
More

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with PFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then PFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
+1.11%
PFS - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
FNB - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
BHLB - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
FULT - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
MBWM - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More