FULT
Price
$24.33
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.66B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RNST
Price
$43.57
Change
+$0.23 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.98B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs RNST

FULT vs RNST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. RNST commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and RNST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $24.33 vs. RNST: $43.57)
Brand notoriety: FULT and RNST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 58% vs. RNST: 83%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.66B vs. RNST: $3.98B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.66B. RNST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than RNST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNST’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RNST’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNST is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while RNST (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

RNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.66B) has a higher market cap than RNST($3.98B). RNST has higher P/E ratio than FULT: RNST (12.74) vs FULT (11.70). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 28.058 vs. RNST (25.224). RNST has more cash in the bank: 365M vs. FULT (312M). RNST has less debt than FULT: RNST (800M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than RNST: FULT (1.33B) vs RNST (1.09B).
FULTRNSTFULT / RNST
Capitalization4.66B3.98B117%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.05825.224111%
P/E Ratio11.7012.7492%
Revenue1.33B1.09B122%
Total Cash312M365M85%
Total Debt1.25B800M157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs RNST: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
RNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7188
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3365
SMR RATING
1..100
2433
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RNST (46). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to RNST’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RNST (65). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to RNST’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RNST (33). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to RNST’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RNST (45). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to RNST’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RNST (68). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to RNST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTRNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RNST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSSD25.050.04
+0.16%
Cohen & Steers Sh Dur Pref & Inc Act ETF
EMHY40.230.04
+0.10%
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF
IBID25.72-0.01
-0.02%
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF
SMCF40.33-0.09
-0.22%
Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF
ESGD104.70-0.64
-0.61%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.04%
ASB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More