FULT
Price
$23.52
Change
-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Updated
Aug 21, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.52B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFIN
Price
$73.79
Change
-$0.14 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 21, 12:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.77B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs TFIN

FULT vs TFIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. TFIN commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Hold and TFIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 21, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $23.65 vs. TFIN: $74.16)
Brand notoriety: FULT and TFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 77% vs. TFIN: 74%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.52B vs. TFIN: $1.77B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.52B. TFIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than TFIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TFIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FULT and TFIN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while TFIN (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

TFIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.52B) has a higher market cap than TFIN($1.77B). TFIN has higher P/E ratio than FULT: TFIN (49.95) vs FULT (11.36). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 24.479 vs. TFIN (18.410). FULT has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. TFIN (84.6M). TFIN has less debt than FULT: TFIN (113M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than TFIN: FULT (1.33B) vs TFIN (442M).
FULTTFINFULT / TFIN
Capitalization4.52B1.77B255%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.47918.410133%
P/E Ratio11.3649.9523%
Revenue1.33B442M300%
Total Cash312M84.6M369%
Total Debt1.25B113M1,109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs TFIN: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
TFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5779
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
2560
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (93). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TFIN (100). This means that FULT’s stock grew significantly faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (60). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

TFIN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (49). This means that TFIN’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (97). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTTFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAP75.241.36
+1.84%
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
FEOE56.090.87
+1.58%
FIRST EAGLE OVERSEAS EQUITY ETF
FTCE27.850.21
+0.74%
First Trust New Cstrcts Cr Erns Ldrs ETF
XAGG49.990.12
+0.25%
Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
DECO70.610.10
+0.14%
State Street® Galaxy Dgtl Ast Ecosys ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-2.67%
ASB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
-2.72%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
More

TFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFIN has been loosely correlated with OBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TFIN jumps, then OBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFIN
1D Price
Change %
TFIN100%
-2.75%
OBK - TFIN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
FHB - TFIN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
FULT - TFIN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
BANR - TFIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
AUB - TFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
More