FULT
Price
$22.80
Change
+$0.21 (+0.93%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.39B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFIN
Price
$62.16
Change
+$1.03 (+1.68%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.45B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FULT vs TFIN

FULT vs TFIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FULT vs. TFIN commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a StrongBuy and TFIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FULT vs TFIN: Fundamental Ratings
FULT
TFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8763
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
1121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8539

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (89). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (100). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFIN (21). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TFIN (62). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFIN (97). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTTFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (FULT: $22.59 vs. TFIN: $61.13)
Brand notoriety: FULT and TFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 125% vs. TFIN: 182%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $4.39B vs. TFIN: $1.45B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.39B. TFIN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TFIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than TFIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FULT and TFIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while TFIN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

TFIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRF10.160.15
+1.48%
Eagle Capital Growth Fund
ARTY79.120.80
+1.02%
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY)
UTWY39.120.13
+0.33%
US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY)
FTMH10.85-0.01
-0.09%
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH)
TSLT12.55-0.06
-0.48%
T-REX 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT)

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.98%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
ASB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
More

TFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFIN has been loosely correlated with FHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TFIN jumps, then FHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFIN
1D Price
Change %
TFIN100%
+1.90%
FHB - TFIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
FULT - TFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
UBSI - TFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
AUB - TFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
OBK - TFIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More