Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$35.52
Change+$0.39 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$69.09
Change+$0.63 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.59B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FWAFX (3.08B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (0.77) vs FWAFX (0.56). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. FWAFX (-5.42). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. FWAFX (24.60).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.081 | 11.364 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 153B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.77 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.42 | 11.27 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.87 | 41.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 51.48 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.42 | 85.45 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement