Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$37.98
Change-$0.47 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWAFX (3.57B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FWAFX (0.48). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. FWAFX (-3.12). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. FWAFX (13.12).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.444 | 16.763 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.69 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.12 | 12.05 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.41 | 47.14 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.12 | 28.33 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.01 | 90.02 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement