Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$36.74
Change+$0.35 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.35
Change+$0.45 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FWAFX (3.28B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (0.74) vs FWAFX (0.52). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. FWAFX (-2.39). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. FWAFX (20.74).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.778 | 13.395 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 156B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.74 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 12.00 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.96 | 47.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.74 | 42.32 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.75 | 83.04 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement