Ad is loading...
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$34.80
Change-$0.82 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.35B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$64.92
Change-$0.80 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.51B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FWAFX (3.35B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (1.07) vs FWAFX (0.56). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. RNPFX (17.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. FWAFX (2.87). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. FWAFX (21.94).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.113 | 4.642 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.07 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 10.73 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.29 | 15.15 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.94 | 35.40 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.16 | 74.81 | 70% |