Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$38.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.44
Change-$0.20 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.39B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (0.72) vs FWAFX (0.50). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. FWAFX (4.12). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.56 vs. FWAFX (22.12).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.938 | 18.375 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.72 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 15.12 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 52.55 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.12 | 40.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.13 | 104.45 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement