Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWAFX vs RNPFX
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWAFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.44
Change+$0.45 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.59
Change+$0.42 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWAFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWAFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWAFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: RNPFX (0.70) vs FWAFX (0.49). FWAFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWAFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWAFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.29 vs. FWAFX (0.27). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.89 vs. FWAFX (16.71).
| FWAFX | RNPFX | FWAFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.46 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.407 | 20.229 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.70 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 14.29 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.91 | 65.52 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.71 | 36.89 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.46 | 103.51 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement