FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. HDQVX (312M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than HDQVX: FWCBX (3.00) vs HDQVX (1.73). FWCBX was incepted earlier than HDQVX: FWCBX (6 years) vs HDQVX (9 years). HDQVX (3.03) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FWCBX (50.00) and HDQVX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDQVX: FWCBX (250) vs HDQVX (2500). HDQVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.33 vs. FWCBX (13.53). HDQVX return over 5 years is better than : 63.52 vs. FWCBX (46.27).

	FWCBX	HDQVX	FWCBX / HDQVX
Total Expense Ratio	0.31	1.27	24%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.31	3.03	10%
Fund Existence	6 years	9 years	-
Gain YTD	10.614	18.956	56%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	250	2500	10%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	128B	312M	41,026%
Annual Yield % from dividends	3.00	1.73	173%
Returns for 1 year	13.53	22.33	61%
Returns for 3 years	42.54	59.49	72%
Returns for 5 years	46.27	63.52	73%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
CNWGX	28.33	0.78	+2.83%
Calamos Evolving World Growth A
RGGHX	42.52	0.19	+0.45%
American Funds Global Balanced R-2E
HIADX	25.75	N/A	N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IA
LMCYX	36.89	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock I
MCSMX	13.77	N/A	N/A
Matthews China Innovators