Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RMATX
FWCBX vs RMATX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RMATX
FWCBX vs RMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RMATX (606M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RMATX: FWCBX (3.00) vs RMATX (2.59). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RMATX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RMATX (9 years). RMATX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RMATX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RMATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.12 vs. FWCBX (10.71). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. RMATX (25.58).
| FWCBX | RMATX | FWCBX / RMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.80 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.597 | 6.866 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 606M | 21,122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 2.59 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 13.12 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.46 | 40.34 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.02 | 25.58 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement