Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCBX vs RMATX
FWCBX vs RMATX Comparison
Open Charts FWCBX vs RMATX
FWCBX vs RMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RMATX (605M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than RMATX: FWCBX (2.97) vs RMATX (2.58). FWCBX was incepted earlier than RMATX: FWCBX (6 years) vs RMATX (9 years). RMATX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). RMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). RMATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: RMATX (0) vs FWCBX (250). RMATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. FWCBX (12.80). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.90 vs. RMATX (26.69).
| FWCBX | RMATX | FWCBX / RMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.80 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.608 | 7.713 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 605M | 21,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.58 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 16.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.76 | 45.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.90 | 26.69 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement