Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs RW
FWD vs RW Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs RW
FWD vs RW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. RW commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Buy and RW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.2B vs. RW (17.6M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than RW: FWD (24.375) vs RW (2.519). FWD was incepted earlier than RW: FWD (3 years) vs RW (1 year). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than RW (0.95). FWD (196.00) and RW (187.00) have matching turnover.
| FWD | RW | FWD / RW | |
| Gain YTD | 24.375 | 2.519 | 968% |
| Net Assets | 3.2B | 17.6M | 18,159% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.95 | 68% |
| Turnover | 196.00 | 187.00 | 105% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.10 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | RW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| COHR - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||
RW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RW and AME have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RW and AME's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y