Intraday BUY SELL Signals
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TER
FWD vs TER Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TER
FWD vs TER Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TER commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a StrongBuy and TER is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TER: Fundamental Ratings
TER | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| COHR - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +7.10% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | +4.21% | ||
More | ||||
TER and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TER has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TER jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TER | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TER | 100% | +4.21% | ||
| LRCX - TER | 77% Closely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| STM - TER | 74% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| ONTO - TER | 73% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| TXN - TER | 72% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| RMBS - TER | 72% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
More | ||||