Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TRFM commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and TRFM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.12B vs. TRFM (237M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than TRFM: FWD (27.737) vs TRFM (25.435). FWD was incepted earlier than TRFM: FWD (3 years) vs TRFM (4 years). TRFM (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover TRFM (79.00) vs TRFM (79.00).
| FWD | TRFM | FWD / TRFM | |
| Gain YTD | 27.737 | 25.435 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 237M | 1,318% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Turnover | 196.00 | 79.00 | 248% |
| Yield | 0.08 | 0.13 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -3.47% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -5.36% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -4.07% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
More | ||||
TRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been loosely correlated with SABR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then SABR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFM | 100% | -2.21% | ||
| SABR - TRFM | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| CD - TRFM | 32% Poorly correlated | -10.85% | ||
| GLW - TRFM | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.08% | ||
| ASX - TRFM | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.92% | ||
| ETN - TRFM | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||