Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TRFM
FWD vs TRFM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TRFM commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and TRFM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.18B vs. TRFM (264M). TRFM (22.384) and FWD (22.172) have matching annual dividend yield . FWD was incepted earlier than TRFM: FWD (3 years) vs TRFM (4 years). TRFM (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover TRFM (79.00) vs TRFM (79.00).
| FWD | TRFM | FWD / TRFM | |
| Gain YTD | 22.172 | 22.384 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 3.18B | 264M | 1,204% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Turnover | 196.00 | 79.00 | 248% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.14 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| COHR - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
More | ||||
TRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been loosely correlated with SABR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then SABR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFM | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| SABR - TRFM | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| ASX - TRFM | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| GLW - TRFM | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.01% | ||
| CD - TRFM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ONTO - TRFM | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.59% | ||
More | ||||