Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs POSKX
FWMMX vs POSKX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs POSKX
FWMMX vs POSKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. POSKX (4.59B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than POSKX: FWMMX (1.41) vs POSKX (0.74). FWMMX was incepted earlier than POSKX: FWMMX (6 years) vs POSKX (22 years). POSKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. POSKX (9.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than POSKX: FWMMX (250) vs POSKX (2000). POSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.39 vs. FWMMX (5.34). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. POSKX (-1.77).
| FWMMX | POSKX | FWMMX / POSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | 19.325 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.59B | 4,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.74 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 7.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.28 | 11.85 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | -1.77 | -1,739% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement