Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs POSKX
FWMMX vs POSKX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs POSKX
FWMMX vs POSKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. POSKX (4.7B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than POSKX: FWMMX (1.37) vs POSKX (0.77). FWMMX was incepted earlier than POSKX: FWMMX (6 years) vs POSKX (22 years). POSKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. POSKX (9.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than POSKX: FWMMX (250) vs POSKX (2000). POSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. FWMMX (6.72). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.63 vs. POSKX (-1.62).
| FWMMX | POSKX | FWMMX / POSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.976 | 21.164 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.7B | 4,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.77 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 15.80 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.73 | 19.62 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | -1.62 | -1,766% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement