Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs SLGFX
FWMMX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs SLGFX
FWMMX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SLGFX (1.29B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than SLGFX: FWMMX (1.37) vs SLGFX (0.86). FWMMX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: FWMMX (6 years) vs SLGFX (8 years). SLGFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: FWMMX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.49 vs. FWMMX (13.06). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.92 vs. FWMMX (35.40).
| FWMMX | SLGFX | FWMMX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.25 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.639 | 8.884 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.29B | 16,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.86 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 19.49 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.56 | 59.60 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.40 | 65.92 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement