Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs WTRCX
FWMMX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs WTRCX
FWMMX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. WTRCX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Hold and WTRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WTRCX (3.79B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: FWMMX (1.39) vs WTRCX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). WTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: FWMMX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. WTRCX (-6.29). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.24 vs. WTRCX (-28.44).
| FWMMX | WTRCX | FWMMX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.74 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.76 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.866 | 11.050 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.79B | 5,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | -6.29 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.18 | 3.15 | 1,087% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.24 | -28.44 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement