Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs WTRCX
FWMMX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs WTRCX
FWMMX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. WTRCX (3.75B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: FWMMX (1.41) vs WTRCX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). WTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: FWMMX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. WTRCX (-7.36). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. WTRCX (-27.84).
| FWMMX | WTRCX | FWMMX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.74 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.76 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | 8.932 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 3.75B | 5,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | -7.36 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.28 | -2.81 | -971% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | -27.84 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement