Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HIBSX
FWWMX vs HIBSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HIBSX
FWWMX vs HIBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HIBSX (1.17B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than HIBSX: FWWMX (1.40) vs HIBSX (0.81). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HIBSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs HIBSX (28 years). HIBSX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HIBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). HIBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: HIBSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. HIBSX (-4.04). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.14 vs. HIBSX (-3.79).
| FWWMX | HIBSX | FWWMX / HIBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.77 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.77 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 2.414 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.17B | 18,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.81 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | -4.04 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 1.96 | 1,540% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.14 | -3.79 | -769% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement