Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TAGRX
FWWMX vs TAGRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TAGRX
FWWMX vs TAGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. TAGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and TAGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TAGRX (5.88B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TAGRX: FWWMX (1.41) vs TAGRX (0.22). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TAGRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TAGRX (42 years). TAGRX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). TAGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TAGRX: FWWMX (250) vs TAGRX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. TAGRX (-4.47). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. TAGRX (-8.48).
| FWWMX | TAGRX | FWWMX / TAGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.01 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.02 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 4.071 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.88B | 3,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.22 | 649% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -4.47 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 13.74 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -8.48 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement