Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TRSCX
FWWMX vs TRSCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TRSCX
FWWMX vs TRSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. TRSCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and TRSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TRSCX (5.83B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TRSCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs TRSCX (0.75). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TRSCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TRSCX (24 years). TRSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRSCX (25.00). TRSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: TRSCX (0) vs FWWMX (250). TRSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. TRSCX (14.50).
| FWWMX | TRSCX | FWWMX / TRSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.42 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.42 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 12.325 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.83B | 3,742% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.75 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 9.35 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 31.37 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 14.50 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement