Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs MCEMX
FWWNX vs MCEMX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs MCEMX
FWWNX vs MCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWNX vs. MCEMX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWNX is a Hold and MCEMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. MCEMX (420M). FWWNX pays higher dividends than MCEMX: FWWNX (1.21) vs MCEMX (0.51). FWWNX was incepted earlier than MCEMX: FWWNX (6 years) vs MCEMX (11 years). MCEMX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). FWWNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCEMX (25.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCEMX: FWWNX (250) vs MCEMX (1000000). MCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.22 vs. FWWNX (21.15). MCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.98 vs. FWWNX (18.26).
| FWWNX | MCEMX | FWWNX / MCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.86 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.93 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.451 | 21.207 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 420M | 21,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.51 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.15 | 42.22 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.32 | 73.16 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | 23.98 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement