Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. REMCX (1.15B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than REMCX: FWWNX (1.21) vs REMCX (0.99). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMCX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMCX (28 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMCX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.97 vs. FWWNX (15.68). FWWNX (14.59) and REMCX (13.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWNX | REMCX | FWWNX / REMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.29 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.949 | 16.948 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 1.15B | 7,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.68 | 29.97 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.08 | 63.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.59 | 13.89 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers