Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWNX vs. REMCX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWNX is a Hold and REMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. REMCX (1.29B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than REMCX: FWWNX (1.23) vs REMCX (1.05). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMCX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMCX (28 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMCX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.20 vs. FWWNX (20.71). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. FWWNX (20.82).
| FWWNX | REMCX | FWWNX / REMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.29 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.731 | 23.548 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 1.29B | 6,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.71 | 36.20 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.22 | 78.81 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.82 | 22.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement