Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWNX vs. REMCX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWNX is a Hold and REMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. REMCX (1.25B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than REMCX: FWWNX (1.21) vs REMCX (1.01). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMCX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMCX (28 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMCX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.68 vs. FWWNX (14.47). REMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.55 vs. FWWNX (19.67).
| FWWNX | REMCX | FWWNX / REMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.29 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.534 | 23.337 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 1.25B | 7,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.01 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | 27.68 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.15 | 82.23 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.67 | 22.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers