Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMCX
FWWNX vs REMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. REMCX (1.24B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than REMCX: FWWNX (1.21) vs REMCX (0.98). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMCX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMCX (27 years). REMCX (2.29) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMCX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.89 vs. FWWNX (22.03). FWWNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.26 vs. REMCX (14.71).
| FWWNX | REMCX | FWWNX / REMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.29 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.444 | 23.390 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 1.24B | 7,342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.98 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.03 | 40.89 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.99 | 77.55 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.26 | 14.71 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers