Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$21.90
Change+$1.59 (+7.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LAMHX (3.65B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LAMHX (0.89). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. LAMHX (-5.12). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 92.75 vs. LAMHX (48.98).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.60 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.60 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.000 | -11.864 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 3.65B | 16,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.89 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | -5.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 5.73 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.75 | 48.98 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.34 | N/A | - |