Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$26.20
Change-$0.11 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. LAMHX (4.7B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.12) vs LAMHX (0.81). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.85 vs. LAMHX (10.45). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 110.49 vs. LAMHX (57.80).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.710 | 14.681 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723B | 4.7B | 15,399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.81 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.85 | 10.45 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.47 | 61.70 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.49 | 57.80 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 268.48 | 102.69 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement