Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$25.36
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.54B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. LAMHX (4.54B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.16) vs LAMHX (0.80). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. LAMHX (10.22). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.31 vs. LAMHX (55.93).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.505 | 10.644 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 4.54B | 15,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.80 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.68 | 10.22 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.88 | 46.79 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.31 | 55.93 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 262.15 | 100.19 | 262% |