Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$26.57
Change+$0.24 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Nov 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a StrongBuy and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. LAMHX (4.7B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.11) vs LAMHX (0.81). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (15 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. LAMHX (5.94). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 101.45 vs. LAMHX (51.81).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.139 | 15.815 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737B | 4.7B | 15,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.81 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 5.94 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.67 | 45.46 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.45 | 51.81 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 258.50 | 100.07 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement