Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$25.09
Change+$0.12 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. LAMHX (4.49B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.20) vs LAMHX (0.83). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. LAMHX (11.77). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.10 vs. LAMHX (61.03).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.386 | 9.122 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666B | 4.49B | 14,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.83 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | 11.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.40 | 45.09 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.10 | 61.03 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 235.25 | 88.77 | 265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement