Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$23.23
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. LAMHX (4.18B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.34) vs LAMHX (0.89). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMHX (10 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. LAMHX (6.87). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 113.25 vs. LAMHX (63.49).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.138 | 1.111 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 4.18B | 14,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.89 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.58 | 6.87 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.89 | 35.20 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.25 | 63.49 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement