Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$24.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.59M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. NMIAX (479M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.30) vs NMIAX (0.75). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. NMIAX (-5.88). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.09 vs. NMIAX (15.13).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.23 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.974 | -9.895 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 479M | 124,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.75 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | -5.88 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | -0.61 | -4,197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.09 | 15.13 | 648% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.86 | 21.71 | 806% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...