Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$28.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.2M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. NMIAX (487M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.20) vs NMIAX (0.73). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.56 vs. NMIAX (-1.32). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 109.32 vs. NMIAX (23.22).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.21 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.227 | 1.558 | 464% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666B | 487M | 136,756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.73 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.56 | -1.32 | -1,023% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.99 | 33.87 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.32 | 23.22 | 471% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.30 | 35.37 | 631% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement