Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$27.80
Change+$0.32 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.6M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. NMIAX (508M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.26) vs NMIAX (0.72). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. NMIAX (-1.71). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. NMIAX (12.49).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.23 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.537 | -0.758 | -203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 508M | 124,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.72 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | -1.71 | -728% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.35 | 13.66 | 361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.49 | 12.49 | 805% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.02 | 34.73 | 610% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers