Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$30.49
Change+$0.12 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.32M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. NMIAX (487M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.12) vs NMIAX (0.68). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. NMIAX (4.75). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 111.45 vs. NMIAX (26.16).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.21 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.285 | 9.801 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723B | 487M | 148,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.68 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.27 | 4.75 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.76 | 53.43 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.45 | 26.16 | 426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 267.13 | 54.13 | 494% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers