Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$26.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.75M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. NMIAX (511M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.34) vs NMIAX (0.75). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. NMIAX (-3.93). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.40 vs. NMIAX (17.39).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.23 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.366 | -5.417 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 511M | 116,243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.75 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | -3.93 | -254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.07 | 13.35 | 360% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.40 | 17.39 | 623% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.80 | 26.30 | 741% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...