Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$29.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.19M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. NMIAX (484M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.16) vs NMIAX (0.70). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.54 vs. NMIAX (5.42). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 109.38 vs. NMIAX (25.06).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.21 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.949 | 7.668 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 484M | 143,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.70 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.54 | 5.42 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.60 | 42.85 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.38 | 25.06 | 436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 268.69 | 55.83 | 481% |