Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$28.87
Change+$0.27 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets496.1M
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a StrongBuy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. NMIAX (496M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.19) vs NMIAX (0.72). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIAX (29 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.70 vs. NMIAX (7.89). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.40 vs. NMIAX (21.89).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.21 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.435 | 4.378 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682B | 496M | 137,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.72 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.70 | 7.89 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.06 | 29.35 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.40 | 21.89 | 482% |
| Returns for 10 years | 236.50 | 41.90 | 564% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement