Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBRX
FXAIX vs NSBRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBRX
FXAIX vs NSBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. NSBRX (6.18B). FXAIX (1.03) and NSBRX (0.99) have matching dividends . FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBRX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBRX (20 years). NSBRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBRX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBRX (100000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. NSBRX (-5.88). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. NSBRX (23.91).
| FXAIX | NSBRX | FXAIX / NSBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.66 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.66 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 1.223 | 964% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 6.18B | 13,891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | -5.88 | -282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 21.30 | 361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 23.91 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 100.11 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement