Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs RFNCX
FXAIX vs RFNCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RFNCX
FXAIX vs RFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RFNCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and RFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. RFNCX (183B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RFNCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs RFNCX (0.33). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RFNCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs RFNCX (24 years). RFNCX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RFNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFNCX: FXAIX (0) vs RFNCX (250). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.42 vs. RFNCX (21.35). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 87.95 vs. RFNCX (35.27).
| FXAIX | RFNCX | FXAIX / RFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.93 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.93 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.145 | 12.327 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 183B | 455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.33 | 317% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.42 | 21.35 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.10 | 55.57 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.95 | 35.27 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 297.05 | 104.77 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers