FXI
Price
$34.17
Change
+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Net Assets
3.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KWEB
Price
$24.72
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Net Assets
4.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXI vs KWEB

FXI vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 09, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) vs. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) provides broad exposure to 50 large-cap Chinese equities listed in Hong Kong, with heavy weighting toward financials and consumer discretionary sectors.
  • KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) targets approximately 45 China-based internet and internet-related companies, emphasizing consumer discretionary and communication services through a thematic lens.
  • FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index with a 0.73% expense ratio, while KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index with a 0.69% expense ratio, offering slightly lower costs for its specialized exposure.
  • Structural differences include FXI's concentration in banking and traditional large-caps versus KWEB's focus on technology-driven internet platforms, leading to distinct risk profiles and sector sensitivities.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed, open-ended structures with strong liquidity on major U.S. exchanges, though KWEB exhibits higher volatility due to its narrower thematic mandate.
  • In the current environment, relative positioning favors diversification across broad market leaders in FXI or growth-oriented internet names in KWEB depending on investor views on regulatory and consumption trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking China equity exposure often compare FXI and KWEB because the two exchange-traded funds (ETFs) address overlapping yet differentiated segments of the Chinese market. FXI offers broad large-cap representation, while KWEB delivers targeted access to internet and technology companies. They do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for expressing views on China's economic trajectory, regulatory landscape, and consumption patterns. This comparison highlights structural distinctions that influence long-term positioning and risk management.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) Overview

The iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) seeks to track the performance of the FTSE China 50 Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of the largest Chinese companies available to international investors and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and maintains a passive, open-ended structure. Top holdings typically include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., China Construction Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Xiaomi Corp. Sector allocations emphasize financials at around 36%, consumer discretionary near 25%, and communication services at approximately 15%, with smaller weights in information technology, energy, and materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.73%. Rebalancing follows the index methodology with liquidity screens, resulting in a concentrated portfolio suited for broad large-cap China exposure without leverage or active management.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Overview

The KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) aims to replicate the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which comprises publicly traded China-based companies whose primary businesses focus on internet and internet-related activities. The ETF maintains roughly 45 holdings in a passive, open-ended format. Prominent positions often feature Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., PDD Holdings Inc., Meituan, and NetEase Inc. Allocations concentrate in consumer discretionary and communication services, with meaningful exposure to technology and related themes. The expense ratio is 0.69%. The index applies free-float market-capitalization weighting and includes listings on Hong Kong, NASDAQ, and NYSE exchanges, delivering a thematic strategy distinct from broad-market approaches.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within China's equity market, influenced by macroeconomic factors such as domestic consumption trends, regulatory oversight of technology platforms, and interest-rate expectations. Capital flows into internet and consumer sectors respond to policy support for technological self-reliance and middle-class growth, while financial institutions in broader indices face credit-cycle and property-market sensitivities. Geopolitical developments and earnings cycles of leading companies continue to shape sector momentum, creating an environment where broad large-cap exposure and internet-specific themes each present distinct opportunities and risks tied to economic reopening and digital transformation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FXI has reflected the performance dynamics of large financial and consumer names, showing sensitivity to banking-sector stability and overall economic indicators. KWEB has demonstrated greater responsiveness to internet-platform earnings and consumption-driven themes, often exhibiting higher volatility during periods of regulatory scrutiny or shifts in digital spending. Relative positioning highlights FXI's broader diversification across traditional sectors versus KWEB's concentrated bet on technology-enabled growth, with both funds experiencing influence from global risk sentiment and China-specific policy developments over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for advanced discovery capabilities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to FXI for investors seeking broader large-cap stability, while noting KWEB's potential edge in thematic growth consistency amid favorable internet-sector tailwinds. The assessment remains probabilistic and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FXI vs. KWEB commentary
Oct 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FXIKWEB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FXI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KWEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMAX64.111.36
+2.16%
Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX)
FPWR35.930.20
+0.57%
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR)
SPGM87.390.07
+0.08%
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM)
PATN36.12N/A
N/A
PACER FDS TR
SNOV27.34-0.05
-0.18%
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV)

FXI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FXI and HKD have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FXI and HKD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FXI
1D Price
Change %
FXI100%
+0.09%
HKD - FXI
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%

KWEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWEB
1D Price
Change %
KWEB100%
-0.12%
BABA - KWEB
89%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
JD - KWEB
83%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
BILI - KWEB
82%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
BIDU - KWEB
80%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
KC - KWEB
79%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
More