Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MFSCX
FXNCX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MFSCX
FXNCX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. MFSCX (252M). MFSCX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MFSCX (3.45) vs FXNCX (3.04). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FXNCX (16.14). MFSCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FXNCX (4%) vs FXNCX (4%). FXNCX (1000) and MFSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX (8.14) and MFSCX (8.14) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.25 vs. FXNCX (-0.07).
| FXNCX | MFSCX | FXNCX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.84 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.984 | 2.004 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 252M | 229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 8.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 11.49 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.07 | 2.25 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.10 | 14.14 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement