Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MFSCX
FXNCX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MFSCX
FXNCX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 587M vs. MFSCX (256M). MFSCX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MFSCX (3.45) vs FXNCX (3.04). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). MFSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FXNCX (16.14). MFSCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FXNCX (4%) vs FXNCX (4%). FXNCX (1000) and MFSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFSCX (7.60) and FXNCX (7.54) have marching annual gain over last year. MFSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.59 vs. FXNCX (0.14).
| FXNCX | MFSCX | FXNCX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.84 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.370 | 2.554 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 587M | 256M | 229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 7.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.62 | 11.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.14 | 2.59 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.30 | 13.38 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement