Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FYC vs IWO
FYC vs IWO Comparison
Open Charts FYC vs IWO
FYC vs IWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FYC vs. IWO commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYC is a Buy and IWO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWO has more net assets: 14.8B vs. FYC (1.18B). FYC has a higher annual dividend yield than IWO: FYC (24.224) vs IWO (19.731). FYC was incepted earlier than IWO: FYC (15 years) vs IWO (26 years). IWO (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than FYC (0.70). FYC has a higher turnover IWO (30.00) vs IWO (30.00).
| FYC | IWO | FYC / IWO | |
| Gain YTD | 24.224 | 19.731 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 14.8B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.24 | 292% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 30.00 | 457% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.40 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FYC | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYC has been closely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYC jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYC | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| CSW - FYC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| CTS - FYC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| IESC - FYC | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| CLSK - FYC | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| MTRN - FYC | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||
IWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWO | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| SSD - IWO | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AIT - IWO | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| FIX - IWO | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| ONTO - IWO | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.73% | ||
| SMCI - IWO | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||