Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs WLGCX
GAFFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs WLGCX
GAFFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. WLGCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WLGCX (6.62B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: GAFFX (0.51) vs WLGCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: GAFFX (9 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.29). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). WLGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: WLGCX (1000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. WLGCX (-0.91). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.10 vs. WLGCX (1.02).
| GAFFX | WLGCX | GAFFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.64 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.72 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.586 | 2.931 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.62B | 5,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | -0.91 | -1,688% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.26 | 25.68 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.10 | 1.02 | 2,669% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement