Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs WLGCX
GAFFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs WLGCX
GAFFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. WLGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WLGCX (6.17B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: GAFFX (0.51) vs WLGCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: GAFFX (9 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.29). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). WLGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: WLGCX (1000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. WLGCX (-5.15). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.42 vs. WLGCX (-7.61).
| GAFFX | WLGCX | GAFFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.64 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.72 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.499 | -1.638 | -397% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.17B | 5,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | -5.15 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.01 | 18.42 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.42 | -7.61 | -229% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement