GBDC
Price
$13.20
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOAH
Price
$8.80
Change
+$0.02 (+0.23%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
604.08M
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBDC vs NOAH

GBDC vs NOAH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBDC vs. NOAH commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBDC is a Hold and NOAH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (GBDC: $13.20 vs. NOAH: $8.80)
Brand notoriety: GBDC and NOAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBDC: 98% vs. NOAH: 87%
Market capitalization -- GBDC: $3.43B vs. NOAH: $604.08M
GBDC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.43B. NOAH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $604.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBDC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOAH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GBDC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOAH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBDC is a better buy in the long-term than NOAH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOAH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOAH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOAH is a better buy in the short-term than GBDC.

Price Growth

GBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while NOAH (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBDC is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.

NOAH is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBDC($3.43B) has a higher market cap than NOAH($604M). GBDC has higher P/E ratio than NOAH: GBDC (20.00) vs NOAH (7.76). GBDC YTD gains are higher at: 2.540 vs. NOAH (-6.372). NOAH has higher revenues than GBDC: NOAH (2.62B) vs GBDC (236M).
GBDCNOAHGBDC / NOAH
Capitalization3.43B604M567%
EBITDAN/A827M-
Gain YTD2.540-6.372-40%
P/E Ratio20.007.76258%
Revenue236M2.62B9%
Total Cash26.2MN/A-
Total Debt4.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBDC vs NOAH: Fundamental Ratings
GBDC
NOAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
4582
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5072
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBDC's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOAH (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NOAH (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew similarly to NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

GBDC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOAH (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that GBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBDCNOAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOAH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSVIX27.400.23
+0.85%
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst2
RKSIX13.070.11
+0.85%
Rockefeller US Small Cap Core I
FMBRX20.590.13
+0.64%
Franklin Mutual Beacon R6
RGBLX43.200.21
+0.49%
American Funds Global Balanced R-1
WFATX40.620.09
+0.22%
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Instl

GBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBDC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBDC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBDC
1D Price
Change %
GBDC100%
-0.08%
ARCC - GBDC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
OBDC - GBDC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
OCSL - GBDC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
BXSL - GBDC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
MSDL - GBDC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
More

NOAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOAH and SLRC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOAH and SLRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOAH
1D Price
Change %
NOAH100%
+0.23%
SLRC - NOAH
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
HTGC - NOAH
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
GBDC - NOAH
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
NTRSO - NOAH
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
DFDV - NOAH
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.51%
More