It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GBLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GBLI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GBLI (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.02% price change this week, while WTM (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +11.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.13%.
GBLI is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
WTM is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| GBLI | WTM | GBLI / WTM | |
| Capitalization | 394M | 5.08B | 8% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.894 | -1.265 | 387% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.39 | 5.07 | 225% |
| Revenue | 451M | 2.83B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 1.25B | 1.57B | 80% |
| Total Debt | 7.9M | 835M | 1% |
GBLI | WTM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GBLI's Valuation (8) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTM (55). This means that GBLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTM’s over the last 12 months.
WTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBLI (82). This means that WTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBLI’s over the last 12 months.
WTM's SMR Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBLI (86). This means that WTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBLI’s over the last 12 months.
WTM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as GBLI (69). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to GBLI’s over the last 12 months.
GBLI's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (100). This means that GBLI’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.
| GBLI | WTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 45% | 15 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 37% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLI and SIGI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLI and SIGI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBLI | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| SIGI - GBLI | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| THG - GBLI | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| L - GBLI | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| SIGIP - GBLI | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| WTM - GBLI | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTM has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTM jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.