Advertisement
GBTG vs WALD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBTG is a Buy and WALD is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GBTG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GBTG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WALD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
| GBTG | WALD | GBTG / WALD | |
| Capitalization | 2.84B | 794M | 357% |
| EBITDA | 190M | -17.21M | -1,104% |
| Gain YTD | -21.875 | -59.950 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.29B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 476M | 99.7K | 477,432% |
| Total Debt | 1.43B | 2.1M | 68,286% |
| GBTG | WALD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 17 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 78% |
Advertisement
GBTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBTG has been loosely correlated with YOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBTG jumps, then YOU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBTG | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| YOU - GBTG | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| QLYS - GBTG | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| ALRM - GBTG | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| ADSK - GBTG | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.99% | ||
| DJCO - GBTG | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
WALD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WALD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALD | 100% | -4.17% | ||
| SOS - WALD | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
| GBTG - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| AFRM - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +5.48% | ||
| RXT - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
| BTDR - WALD | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||