Advertisement
AFRM vs WALD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a StrongBuy and WALD is a Hold.
| AFRM | WALD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | 15 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while WALD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AFRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WALD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WALD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.59% price change this week, while WALD (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -10.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
WALD is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-3.80% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Household/Personal Care (-2.95% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSCT | 82.06 | 1.24 | +1.54% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) | |||
| VSMV | 59.75 | 0.14 | +0.24% |
| VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) | |||
| SMTH | 24.58 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| ALPS/SMITH Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) | |||
| MFUL | 22.05 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Collaborative Investment - Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) | |||
| KNOW | 12.53 | -0.09 | -0.74% |
| Fundamentals First ETF (KNOW) | |||
AFRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRM | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| COIN - AFRM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| CLSK - AFRM | 71% Closely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| RIOT - AFRM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| UPST - AFRM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| SOFI - AFRM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
WALD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WALD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALD | 100% | +7.35% | ||
| SOS - WALD | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.72% | ||
| GBTG - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFRM - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MAGN - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| RXT - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
More | ||||