GCBC
Price
$33.46
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
569.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$60.08
Change
+$0.35 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCBC vs MBWM

GCBC vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCBC vs. MBWM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCBC is a Buy and MBWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GCBC: $33.46 vs. MBWM: $60.08)
Brand notoriety: GCBC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCBC: 78% vs. MBWM: 38%
Market capitalization -- GCBC: $569.67M vs. MBWM: $1.04B
GCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $569.67M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GCBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than GCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than GCBC.

Price Growth

GCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($1.04B) has a higher market cap than GCBC($570M). GCBC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: GCBC (13.88) vs MBWM (10.56). GCBC YTD gains are higher at: 51.767 vs. MBWM (26.791). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 48.4M vs. GCBC (8.8M). GCBC has less debt than MBWM: GCBC (107M) vs MBWM (472M). MBWM has higher revenues than GCBC: MBWM (261M) vs GCBC (88.1M).
GCBCMBWMGCBC / MBWM
Capitalization570M1.04B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.76726.791193%
P/E Ratio13.8810.56131%
Revenue88.1M261M34%
Total Cash8.8M48.4M18%
Total Debt107M472M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCBC vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
GCBC
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4712
SMR RATING
1..100
5047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4133
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCBC (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCBC (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GCBC (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to GCBC’s over the last 12 months.

GCBC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GCBC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GCBC (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to GCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCBCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPNNX6.910.06
+0.88%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income R
TGVFX51.250.42
+0.83%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth A
PKAPX17.550.02
+0.11%
PIMCO RAE US I-2
RIDAX27.68-0.03
-0.11%
American Funds Income Fd of Amer R-1
AIORX11.97-0.04
-0.33%
American Century International Opps R

GCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCBC has been loosely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCBC jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCBC
1D Price
Change %
GCBC100%
+0.06%
MBWM - GCBC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
BHRB - GCBC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
SHBI - GCBC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
SRCE - GCBC
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FMBH - GCBC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.59%
THFF - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SRCE - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
FRME - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
EFSC - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
PRK - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
More