MBWM
Price
$60.08
Change
+$0.35 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SRCE
Price
$89.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBWM vs SRCE

MBWM vs SRCE Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) vs. 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MBWM and SRCE are both well-established Midwestern regional bank holding companies, but they differ markedly in scale, geographic footprint, and business diversification.
  • SRCE posted a standout Q2 2026 with a return on assets (ROA) of 2.0% and an EPS beat of $0.24, while MBWM delivered solid but less spectacular results, with adjusted EPS of $1.53 beating estimates by $0.21.
  • On valuation, MBWM trades at a notably lower P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple of approximately 10.6x versus SRCE at roughly 12.6x, though SRCE commands its premium through higher profitability metrics.
  • Both companies recently raised their quarterly dividends, but SRCE boasts a 33-year streak of consecutive dividend increases, signaling exceptional long-term shareholder commitment.
  • MBWM is actively integrating its acquisition of Eastern Michigan Financial Corporation, creating a near-term catalyst but adding integration risk, while SRCE is executing on organic growth with specialized verticals including wealth management and insurance.
  • Market momentum has favored SRCE in recent months, with the stock up over 46% year-to-date, significantly outpacing MBWM's roughly 28% gain, though both have handily outperformed broader regional bank indices.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a distinctive corner of the financial sector — close enough to Main Street to reflect local economic health, yet sufficiently scaled to attract institutional investor attention. Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM), headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and 1st Source Corporation (SRCE), based in South Bend, Indiana, are two such names that have drawn consistent interest from value-conscious and income-oriented investors alike. Both operate in the Great Lakes region, both have delivered strong returns in recent years, and both recently raised dividends. Yet beneath these surface similarities lie meaningful differences in profitability, growth strategy, and market positioning. This comparison aims to equip traders and investors with a clear, data-driven view of how these two regional banking franchises stack up in the current environment.

MBWM Overview and Recent Performance

Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the holding company for Mercantile Bank and, following its December 2025 acquisition, Eastern Michigan Bank. With combined assets of approximately $6.8 billion and over 50 locations across Michigan, it ranks among the largest bank holding companies founded and headquartered in the state. The bank provides a full suite of commercial and consumer banking services, with a particular emphasis on commercial lending to small and mid-sized businesses.

In recent weeks, MBWM has been navigating the post-acquisition integration of Eastern Michigan Financial Corporation — a $572 million-asset institution that expanded Mercantile's reach into East and Southeast Michigan. The company's Q2 2026 results, released in late July, showed net income of $25.9 million ($1.50 per diluted share), with adjusted EPS of $1.53 handily beating consensus estimates. Net interest margin (NIM) — a key measure of lending profitability — expanded to 3.59%, up from 3.48% a year earlier, driven by lower funding costs and effective balance sheet management. The loan-to-deposit ratio improved markedly to 93%, reflecting robust local deposit generation and the acquired deposit base. Commercial loan growth accelerated to an annualized 11.7% during the quarter, and asset quality remained exceptionally strong, with non-performing assets at just 9 basis points (0.09%) of total assets. The company also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.40 per share, extending its track record of returning capital to shareholders.

The stock has trended upward through much of 2026, supported by steady earnings beats and the strategic rationale of the Eastern Michigan acquisition. However, analyst sentiment is mixed — the consensus rating stands at "Hold" with an average price target near $60.40, reflecting some caution around integration costs and the broader interest rate environment.

SRCE Overview and Recent Performance

1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the bank holding company for 1st Source Bank, a diversified financial institution headquartered in South Bend, Indiana, with roots tracing back to 1863. The company serves clients across northern Indiana, southwestern Michigan, and select Florida markets through a blend of commercial banking, consumer banking, wealth management, trust services, and insurance products. With total assets of approximately $9.1 billion as of year-end 2025, SRCE is meaningfully larger than MBWM by asset size.

SRCE delivered a standout Q2 2026 performance that captured significant market attention. The company reported EPS of $1.95, beating the consensus estimate of $1.71 by a substantial $0.24 margin, while revenue of $118.2 million exceeded expectations by 3.5%. Net interest income grew 9.3% year-over-year to $93.1 million, and the net interest margin held firm at an impressive 4.2% — a level notably above most regional bank peers, including MBWM. The efficiency ratio, a measure of operating costs relative to revenue, came in at a lean 46.6%, underscoring disciplined expense management. Perhaps most notably, return on assets reached 2.0%, a threshold widely regarded as excellent in commercial banking.

The company also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.43 per share, marking the latest step in an extraordinary 33-year streak of consecutive annual dividend increases — a record that places SRCE among an elite group of dividend stalwarts. In recent market activity, the stock has surged roughly 46% year-to-date, handily outpacing the Nasdaq Bank Index. Piper Sandler recently raised its price target to $100, pointing to organic balance sheet growth, NIM resilience, and above-average capital returns as key catalysts. With a beta of just 0.58, SRCE has delivered these returns with lower-than-average market sensitivity.

Trending AI Robots

In an era where algorithmic and AI-driven trading strategies increasingly shape market dynamics, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders a curated window into the platform's most compelling automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots spanning thousands of tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in this featured section. These bots cover a wide spectrum of trading styles — from swing trading and trend-following to intraday momentum strategies — operating across timeframes as short as 5 minutes and as long as several weeks. Performance metrics vary by strategy, with top-performing bots in recent periods posting annualized returns well into the triple digits and win rates consistently above 55–65%. Each bot on the platform is powered by Tickeron's Financial Learning Models (FLMs), which combine machine learning with technical analysis to adapt dynamically to shifting market conditions. For traders seeking data-driven, emotion-free strategies, exploring the Trending AI Robots section may offer valuable insight into the types of signals and strategies currently resonating in live markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, MBWM and SRCE reveal a classic trade-off between value and quality — or, more precisely, between a lower entry multiple and a higher return profile.

Profitability and Efficiency: SRCE holds a clear edge here. Its Q2 2026 ROA of 2.0% and NIM of 4.2% both surpass MBWM's 1.5% ROA and 3.59% NIM by meaningful margins. SRCE's efficiency ratio of 46.6% also signals tighter cost control. These metrics suggest SRCE extracts more earnings from its asset base — a hallmark of a high-quality banking franchise.

Valuation: MBWM trades at approximately 10.6x trailing earnings versus SRCE at 12.6x. For value-oriented investors, MBWM's lower multiple may appear attractive, particularly given its own strong fundamentals. However, SRCE's premium is arguably supported by its superior profitability metrics and longer dividend growth track record.

Growth Strategy: MBWM is pursuing an acquisition-driven expansion model, most recently through the Eastern Michigan integration. This brings near-term catalysts — cost synergies, geographic expansion, and a larger deposit base — but also execution risk. SRCE, by contrast, relies on organic growth supplemented by specialized business lines such as wealth management and insurance, which generate fee income less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

Risk Profile: Both banks maintain strong asset quality, but SRCE's lower beta (0.58 vs. 0.80) and longer public track record of consistent dividend growth may appeal to investors prioritizing stability. MBWM's integration risk, while manageable, introduces a variable that SRCE does not currently face.

Market Sentiment and Momentum: SRCE has been the stronger performer in 2026, with its 46% year-to-date gain reflecting enthusiastic reception of its earnings power and capital return policies. MBWM's 28% gain is healthy but comparatively measured, and the stock's "Hold" consensus rating suggests Wall Street is waiting for clearer evidence that the Eastern Michigan acquisition will deliver on its full potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on the observable data — including relative profitability, trend consistency, market momentum, and catalyst clarity — Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for SRCE over MBWM. SRCE's combination of a higher net interest margin, superior return on assets, a 33-year dividend growth streak, and robust price momentum creates a trend-following and quality-oriented profile that aligns well with probabilistic AI models. The 4.2% NIM, in particular, stands out in a declining-rate environment and signals effective asset-liability management. That said, MBWM's lower valuation multiple and the potential for positive earnings surprises as acquisition synergies materialize mean the gap could narrow if integration milestones are met ahead of schedule. The AI verdict is not a definitive prediction but a probabilistic assessment favoring the stock demonstrating stronger current momentum and higher operational efficiency — which, at this juncture, is SRCE.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MBWM vs. SRCE commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBWM is a Buy and SRCE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MBWM: $60.08 vs. SRCE: $89.74)
Brand notoriety: MBWM and SRCE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBWM: 38% vs. SRCE: 46%
Market capitalization -- MBWM: $1.04B vs. SRCE: $2.16B
MBWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.04B. SRCE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBWM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SRCE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than SRCE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRCE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRCE is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

MBWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while SRCE (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

SRCE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRCE($2.16B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($1.04B). SRCE has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: SRCE (12.88) vs MBWM (10.56). SRCE YTD gains are higher at: 45.306 vs. MBWM (26.791). SRCE has less debt than MBWM: SRCE (231M) vs MBWM (472M). SRCE has higher revenues than MBWM: SRCE (453M) vs MBWM (261M).
MBWMSRCEMBWM / SRCE
Capitalization1.04B2.16B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.79145.30659%
P/E Ratio10.5612.8882%
Revenue261M453M58%
Total Cash48.4MN/A-
Total Debt472M231M204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM vs SRCE: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
SRCE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1210
SMR RATING
1..100
4741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (70). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (12). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (47). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (42). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (33). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBWMSRCE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SRCE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JADE76.270.44
+0.58%
JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF
SPGM85.080.19
+0.22%
State Street® SPDR® Ptf MSCIGlbStkMktETF
TAXX50.48-0.01
-0.03%
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF
NSI37.39-0.02
-0.04%
National Security Emerging Mkts Idx ETF
TSXU51.27-0.23
-0.46%
Direxion Daily Smndctrs Top 5 Bull 2XETF

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.59%
THFF - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SRCE - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
FRME - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
EFSC - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
PRK - MBWM
85%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
More

SRCE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRCE has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SRCE jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCE
1D Price
Change %
SRCE100%
N/A
PEBO - SRCE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
MBWM - SRCE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
THFF - SRCE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
PRK - SRCE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
SHBI - SRCE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More