Ad is loading...
GCOW vs WLDR
GCOW vs WLDR Comparison
Open Charts GCOW vs WLDR
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
Price$36.73
Change+$0.19 (+0.52%)
Volume$196.91K
Net Assets2.19B
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
Price$30.15
Change+$0.25 (+0.84%)
Volume$2.31K
Net Assets31.56M
GCOW vs WLDR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCOW vs. WLDR commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCOW is a Hold and WLDR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCOW has more net assets: 2.19B vs. WLDR (31.6M). GCOW has a higher annual dividend yield than WLDR: GCOW (9.052) vs WLDR (2.045). GCOW was incepted earlier than WLDR: GCOW (9 years) vs WLDR (7 years). GCOW (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than WLDR (0.67). WLDR has a higher turnover GCOW (65.00) vs GCOW (65.00).
| GCOW | WLDR | GCOW / WLDR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.052 | 2.045 | 443% |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 31.6M | 6,940% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.67 | 90% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 104.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 3.96 | 1.77 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GCOW | WLDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCOW has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GCOW jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCOW | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| SHEL - GCOW | 71% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| WDS - GCOW | 69% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| BHP - GCOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| KMI - GCOW | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| BN - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
WLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLDR has been loosely correlated with CARR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLDR jumps, then CARR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDR | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| CARR - WLDR | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| VRT - WLDR | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| USFD - WLDR | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| APP - WLDR | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.23% | ||
| HOOD - WLDR | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||