Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCOW vs WLDR
GCOW vs WLDR Comparison
Open Charts GCOW vs WLDR
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
Price$41.45
Change+$0.14 (+0.34%)
Volume$135.07K
Net Assets2.61B
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
Price$37.16
Change+$0.38 (+1.03%)
Volume$1.78K
Net Assets51.42M
GCOW vs WLDR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCOW vs. WLDR commentary
Dec 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCOW is a StrongBuy and WLDR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCOW has more net assets: 2.61B vs. WLDR (51.4M). WLDR has a higher annual dividend yield than GCOW: WLDR (26.738) vs GCOW (25.011). GCOW was incepted earlier than WLDR: GCOW (10 years) vs WLDR (8 years). GCOW (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than WLDR (0.67). WLDR has a higher turnover GCOW (49.00) vs GCOW (49.00).
| GCOW | WLDR | GCOW / WLDR | |
| Gain YTD | 25.011 | 26.738 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 51.4M | 5,084% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.67 | 90% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 104.00 | 47% |
| Yield | 2.47 | 1.31 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GCOW | WLDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCOW has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GCOW jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCOW | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| SHEL - GCOW | 69% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| BHP - GCOW | 66% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| TTE - GCOW | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| KMI - GCOW | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| BN - GCOW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
WLDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLDR has been loosely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLDR jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDR | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| DAL - WLDR | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| JPM - WLDR | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| APP - WLDR | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| HPE - WLDR | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| BK - WLDR | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||