Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$23.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.04M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GCVUX (519M). GCVUX (1.21) and RMEBX (1.16) have matching dividends . GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. GCVUX (-2.67). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. GCVUX (24.36).
| GCVUX | RMEBX | GCVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.575 | 5.349 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.67 | 8.30 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.34 | 17.96 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.36 | 49.85 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.21 | - |