Ad is loading...
GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$22.18
Change+$0.25 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.33M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.03
Change+$0.72 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. GCVUX (514M). GCVUX (1.22) and RMEBX (1.18) have matching dividends . GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. GCVUX (-7.54). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.15 vs. GCVUX (33.53).
| GCVUX | RMEBX | GCVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.887 | -1.317 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 514M | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.18 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.54 | 3.70 | -204% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.63 | 9.15 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | 53.15 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers