Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
Price$24.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets538.18M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GCVUX (538M). GCVUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GCVUX (1.22) vs RMEBX (1.11). GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.65). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. GCVUX (-2.78). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. GCVUX (29.78).
| GCVUX | RMEBX | GCVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.155 | 10.612 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.78 | 7.63 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.03 | 22.19 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.78 | 53.85 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.03 | 77.43 | 79% |