Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVUX vs RMEBX
GCVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GCVUX (764M). RMEBX (0.99) and GCVUX (0.94) have matching dividends . GCVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVUX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVUX (0.62). GCVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVUX (5000000). GCVUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.87 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. GCVUX (18.68).
| GCVUX | RMEBX | GCVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.731 | 9.416 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 764M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.87 | 8.96 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.70 | 32.63 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.68 | 36.13 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.80 | 90.64 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement