GDX
Price
$95.48
Change
-$0.44 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
27.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$95.20
Change
+$0.19 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
4.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SIL

GDX vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) provides diversified exposure to global gold mining companies with approximately 55–66 holdings, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) concentrates on silver miners with around 40 holdings, resulting in higher concentration risk for SIL.
  • GDX tracks the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index with a lower expense ratio of 0.51%, compared to SIL’s 0.65% expense ratio for tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index.
  • Both ETFs are passive equity vehicles focused on the basic materials sector, but GDX offers broader diversification across large-cap gold producers, whereas SIL exhibits greater sensitivity to silver price movements and industrial demand.
  • Top holdings in GDX include major gold producers such as Newmont Corp (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), and Barrick Mining Corp (B), while SIL’s largest positions feature Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS), and Coeur Mining Inc (CDE).
  • GDX generally demonstrates lower volatility and greater liquidity due to its larger asset base and established track record since 2006, positioning it as a more stable vehicle for precious metals mining exposure relative to SIL’s narrower thematic focus.
  • Structural differences in commodity tilt—gold versus silver—drive distinct risk profiles, with SIL carrying additional exposure to industrial silver applications and potentially higher beta to economic cycles.

Introduction

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) offer investors targeted access to precious metals mining equities, a sector sensitive to commodity prices, monetary policy, and global economic conditions. These ETFs do not compete directly but provide complementary yet differentiated exposure within the mining industry: GDX emphasizes gold producers for a more defensive precious metals tilt, while SIL targets silver miners that blend monetary and industrial demand drivers. Investors comparing the two often seek to balance portfolio exposure to gold versus silver price dynamics amid shifting macroeconomic environments.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index measures the performance of companies primarily involved in gold mining activities worldwide. The fund holds approximately 55–66 equity securities, with allocations concentrated in large-cap producers. Top holdings typically include Newmont Corp (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), Barrick Mining Corp (B), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corp (FNV). Sector allocation is overwhelmingly within basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.51%. Launched in 2006, GDX operates as an open-end fund listed on NYSE Arca and maintains high liquidity characteristics.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passive exchange-traded fund designed to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on companies engaged in silver mining or related activities globally. The fund typically holds around 40 equity securities, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio. Prominent holdings often feature Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS), Coeur Mining Inc (CDE), Hecla Mining Co (HL), and First Majestic Silver Corp (AG). Nearly all assets reside in the basic materials sector. SIL carries an expense ratio of 0.65%. Established in 2010 and listed on NYSE Arca, the fund provides thematic exposure to silver mining equities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a macroeconomic environment shaped by central bank gold purchases, interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and industrial applications for silver in electronics and solar energy. Both ETFs benefit from broader capital flows into commodities during periods of monetary easing or geopolitical uncertainty. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with supply constraints in major producing regions, influence sector dynamics. Silver miners face additional volatility from fluctuating industrial demand tied to economic growth cycles, while gold miners tend to exhibit more stable monetary demand characteristics. Capital allocation decisions by large institutional investors often rotate between gold and silver themes based on relative valuation and macroeconomic signals.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has demonstrated relatively more stable performance patterns linked to sustained gold price trends and operational efficiencies among large producers. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has shown greater sensitivity to silver price movements and industrial demand shifts, often resulting in amplified volatility compared to GDX. During periods of sector rotation driven by commodity price trends or earnings cycles of top holdings, GDX’s broader diversification has supported more consistent relative positioning. SIL’s concentrated holdings can lead to sharper responses to specific company developments or silver-specific catalysts. Liquidity differences further influence positioning, with GDX offering deeper market depth for larger allocations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater diversification across holdings, deeper liquidity profile, and established track record, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) over Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) for investors seeking precious metals mining exposure. The broader gold-focused mandate and cost efficiency contribute to a more resilient profile amid varying commodity cycles, though individual investor objectives and risk tolerance should guide final allocation decisions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SIL commentary
Sep 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a StrongBuy and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 27.7B vs. SIL (4.79B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX: SIL (14.142) vs GDX (11.321). GDX was incepted earlier than SIL: GDX (20 years) vs SIL (16 years). GDX (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GDX has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
GDXSILGDX / SIL
Gain YTD11.32114.14280%
Net Assets27.7B4.79B578%
Total Expense Ratio0.510.6578%
Turnover50.0027.57181%
Yield0.641.0462%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVSI28.99N/A
N/A
Applied Finance IVS International Large ETF
DXUV68.09-0.19
-0.28%
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV)
MGMT49.34-0.26
-0.53%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT)
IVLU43.75-0.61
-1.38%
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU)
BETZ18.22-0.65
-3.47%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ)

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
-0.46%
KGC - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
WPM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
IAG - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+0.20%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
OR - SIL
89%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More