Investors seeking equity exposure to precious metals often compare VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) because both provide targeted access to mining companies rather than physical bullion or futures. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer differentiated strategies within the same broad precious metals theme. GDX emphasizes gold mining operations with secondary silver exposure, while SIL delivers a more specialized allocation to silver-focused producers. The comparison helps clarify structural distinctions, cost profiles, and positioning for investors evaluating sector allocation decisions amid fluctuating commodity cycles and macroeconomic conditions.
The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies primarily engaged in gold mining, with eligibility criteria that also permit limited silver revenue contributions. The fund typically holds 60 to 66 securities, providing diversified exposure across senior producers and select royalty companies. Top holdings commonly include NEM, AEM, Barrick Mining Corp, WPM, and FNV, with the top ten positions accounting for roughly 58% of assets. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on materials, with geographic exposure spanning Canada, the United States, Australia, and emerging markets. The expense ratio stands at 0.51%, and the fund employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic index rebalancing.
The Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The index focuses on companies deriving the majority of revenue from silver mining, exploration, and related activities. The fund generally maintains around 40 holdings, resulting in greater concentration compared with broader precious metals peers. Leading positions frequently feature WPM, PAAS, Coeur Mining Inc, Hecla Mining Co, and First Majestic Silver Corp, with the top ten often exceeding 75% of net assets. Allocation remains concentrated in the materials sector, with primary geographic weights in Canada and the United States. The expense ratio is 0.65%, and the fund follows a market-capitalization-weighted approach with regular index reconstitutions.
Both ETFs operate within the materials sector, specifically the precious metals mining industry, where company performance correlates closely with underlying gold and silver prices, production costs, and operational efficiency. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments that influence safe-haven demand. Silver benefits additionally from industrial applications in solar energy, electronics, and electric vehicles, creating distinct demand dynamics compared with gold. Regulatory changes affecting mining permits and environmental standards represent ongoing sector risks, while capital flows into precious metals equities tend to accelerate during periods of monetary policy uncertainty or currency weakness. These factors shape the broader environment for both gold- and silver-focused miners.
In recent market cycles, GDX has generally exhibited lower volatility than SIL due to its larger number of holdings and inclusion of more established gold producers with diversified revenue streams. SIL tends to display amplified sensitivity to silver price movements because of its concentrated holdings and higher operational leverage typical of pure silver miners. Performance differentials often widen during commodity rotations or shifts in industrial demand for silver versus monetary demand for gold. Both funds have participated in broader precious metals equity rallies tied to declining real yields or heightened macroeconomic uncertainty, though relative positioning depends on the prevailing commodity price trajectory and earnings momentum of top holdings. Liquidity remains robust for each, supporting efficient execution across market environments.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The ETF’s lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and resulting diversification profile provide a more balanced risk exposure within the precious metals mining theme. Its established index methodology and cost efficiency contribute to more consistent positioning across varying market cycles compared with the higher-cost, more concentrated SIL.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| GDX | SIL | GDX / SIL | |
| Gain YTD | 16.183 | 18.866 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 31B | 5.34B | 581% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.65 | 78% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 27.57 | 181% |
| Yield | 0.85 | 1.38 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| GDX | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RCLR | 51.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Reckoner BBB-B Clo Reinvesting ETF | |||
| QNXT | 32.03 | -0.41 | -1.25% |
| iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | |||
| FVC | 42.25 | -0.74 | -1.72% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5 | |||
| AMDY | 42.15 | -0.86 | -2.00% |
| YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| ARKG | 47.64 | -2.23 | -4.47% |
| ARK Genomic Revolution ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIL | 100% | -3.88% | ||
| PAAS - SIL | 95% Closely correlated | -3.68% | ||
| WPM - SIL | 94% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| CDE - SIL | 91% Closely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| OR - SIL | 88% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| VZLA - SIL | 82% Closely correlated | -3.85% | ||
More | ||||