GDX
Price
$99.65
Change
-$4.04 (-3.90%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
30.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$99.14
Change
-$4.00 (-3.88%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
5.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SIL

GDX vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) offers broader exposure to gold mining companies with approximately 60 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.51%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) provides concentrated exposure to silver miners with around 40 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.65%.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed vehicles tracking specialized equity indices focused on precious metals mining, delivering thematic exposure within the materials sector rather than direct commodity ownership.
  • GDX includes a mix of large-cap gold producers with some silver byproducts, whereas SIL maintains a pure-play focus on silver mining operations, resulting in higher concentration risk for the latter.
  • Structural differences in index methodology, geographic diversification, and holding concentration influence relative volatility and sector-specific sensitivity between the two funds.
  • Cost efficiency favors GDX due to its lower expense ratio, while SIL may appeal to investors seeking more targeted silver price leverage through equities.
  • Both funds rebalance periodically according to their underlying indices and trade with high liquidity on major U.S. exchanges.

Introduction

Investors seeking equity exposure to precious metals often compare VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) because both provide targeted access to mining companies rather than physical bullion or futures. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer differentiated strategies within the same broad precious metals theme. GDX emphasizes gold mining operations with secondary silver exposure, while SIL delivers a more specialized allocation to silver-focused producers. The comparison helps clarify structural distinctions, cost profiles, and positioning for investors evaluating sector allocation decisions amid fluctuating commodity cycles and macroeconomic conditions.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies primarily engaged in gold mining, with eligibility criteria that also permit limited silver revenue contributions. The fund typically holds 60 to 66 securities, providing diversified exposure across senior producers and select royalty companies. Top holdings commonly include NEM, AEM, Barrick Mining Corp, WPM, and FNV, with the top ten positions accounting for roughly 58% of assets. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on materials, with geographic exposure spanning Canada, the United States, Australia, and emerging markets. The expense ratio stands at 0.51%, and the fund employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic index rebalancing.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

The Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The index focuses on companies deriving the majority of revenue from silver mining, exploration, and related activities. The fund generally maintains around 40 holdings, resulting in greater concentration compared with broader precious metals peers. Leading positions frequently feature WPM, PAAS, Coeur Mining Inc, Hecla Mining Co, and First Majestic Silver Corp, with the top ten often exceeding 75% of net assets. Allocation remains concentrated in the materials sector, with primary geographic weights in Canada and the United States. The expense ratio is 0.65%, and the fund follows a market-capitalization-weighted approach with regular index reconstitutions.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the materials sector, specifically the precious metals mining industry, where company performance correlates closely with underlying gold and silver prices, production costs, and operational efficiency. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments that influence safe-haven demand. Silver benefits additionally from industrial applications in solar energy, electronics, and electric vehicles, creating distinct demand dynamics compared with gold. Regulatory changes affecting mining permits and environmental standards represent ongoing sector risks, while capital flows into precious metals equities tend to accelerate during periods of monetary policy uncertainty or currency weakness. These factors shape the broader environment for both gold- and silver-focused miners.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDX has generally exhibited lower volatility than SIL due to its larger number of holdings and inclusion of more established gold producers with diversified revenue streams. SIL tends to display amplified sensitivity to silver price movements because of its concentrated holdings and higher operational leverage typical of pure silver miners. Performance differentials often widen during commodity rotations or shifts in industrial demand for silver versus monetary demand for gold. Both funds have participated in broader precious metals equity rallies tied to declining real yields or heightened macroeconomic uncertainty, though relative positioning depends on the prevailing commodity price trajectory and earnings momentum of top holdings. Liquidity remains robust for each, supporting efficient execution across market environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The ETF’s lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and resulting diversification profile provide a more balanced risk exposure within the precious metals mining theme. Its established index methodology and cost efficiency contribute to more consistent positioning across varying market cycles compared with the higher-cost, more concentrated SIL.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SIL commentary
Aug 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a Hold and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 31B vs. SIL (5.34B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX: SIL (18.866) vs GDX (16.183). GDX was incepted earlier than SIL: GDX (20 years) vs SIL (16 years). GDX (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GDX has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
GDXSILGDX / SIL
Gain YTD16.18318.86686%
Net Assets31B5.34B581%
Total Expense Ratio0.510.6578%
Turnover50.0027.57181%
Yield0.851.3862%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCLR51.55N/A
N/A
Reckoner BBB-B Clo Reinvesting ETF
QNXT32.03-0.41
-1.25%
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
FVC42.25-0.74
-1.72%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5
AMDY42.15-0.86
-2.00%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
ARKG47.64-2.23
-4.47%
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
-3.88%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
-3.68%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
OR - SIL
88%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
-3.85%
More