GDX
Price
$89.89
Change
+$5.97 (+7.11%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Net Assets
27.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$88.50
Change
+$5.24 (+6.29%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Net Assets
4.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SIL

GDX vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) tracks a global gold miners index with approximately 60 holdings, offering broader diversification than Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL), which holds about 40 silver-focused companies.
  • GDX maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.51% compared to SIL at 0.65%, providing a cost-efficiency advantage for long-term investors.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track market-capitalization-weighted indices of precious metals mining companies, but GDX emphasizes gold production while SIL targets silver mining operations.
  • SIL exhibits greater concentration risk, with its top holding often exceeding 20% of assets, whereas GDX distributes exposure more evenly across leading producers.
  • GDX benefits from significantly higher assets under management, supporting tighter bid-ask spreads and greater liquidity in the precious metals equity sector.
  • Investors seeking gold mining exposure may prefer GDX for scale and cost, while those targeting silver-specific themes may consider SIL despite its higher fees and narrower focus.

Introduction

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) provide targeted equity exposure within the precious metals mining industry. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors seeking sector-specific returns tied to gold and silver production. In the current environment of fluctuating commodity prices and macroeconomic uncertainty, comparing their structural features helps clarify how each fund aligns with different risk tolerances and thematic preferences.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive ETF that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. The fund invests primarily in equity securities of companies engaged in gold mining and related activities. It typically holds around 60 securities, with top positions including Newmont Corporation (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Sector allocation concentrates heavily in basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.51%. As one of the largest and most liquid vehicles in its category, GDX offers broad global exposure to established gold producers with a market-cap-weighted methodology and periodic rebalancing.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passive ETF designed to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The fund provides exposure to companies involved in silver mining, exploration, and refining. It generally contains approximately 40 holdings, featuring notable concentrations in Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS), and Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Nearly all assets reside in the basic materials sector. The expense ratio is 0.65%. SIL employs a market-cap-weighted approach with scheduled rebalancing and delivers a more specialized, concentrated profile focused exclusively on silver-related operations.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector encompasses companies that extract and process gold and silver, with performance influenced by commodity price trends, global economic conditions, and monetary policy. Gold mining often benefits from its role as a store of value during periods of inflation or geopolitical tension, while silver mining incorporates industrial demand drivers alongside monetary factors. Both ETFs operate in an environment shaped by central bank activities, supply constraints, and shifting investor sentiment toward hard assets. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with capital expenditure cycles among producers, represent ongoing considerations for the sector.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, GDX has demonstrated relatively lower volatility due to its broader diversification across numerous gold producers. In contrast, SIL has shown heightened sensitivity to silver price movements, resulting in more pronounced swings during commodity rotations. Performance differentials often stem from gold versus silver price dynamics, earnings trends at major holdings, and shifts in interest rate expectations. GDX tends to exhibit stronger liquidity characteristics, while SIL provides purer exposure to silver themes that may respond differently to industrial demand fluctuations and macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for diversification, and superior liquidity profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) over Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) for investors seeking balanced precious metals equity exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SIL commentary
Aug 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a StrongBuy and SIL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 27.4B vs. SIL (4.74B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX: SIL (6.109) vs GDX (4.804). GDX was incepted earlier than SIL: GDX (20 years) vs SIL (16 years). GDX (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GDX has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
GDXSILGDX / SIL
Gain YTD4.8046.10979%
Net Assets27.4B4.74B579%
Total Expense Ratio0.510.6578%
Turnover50.0027.57181%
Yield0.851.3862%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDGU32.240.22
+0.68%
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF
NSI38.150.20
+0.54%
National Security Emerging Mkts Idx ETF
VSLU49.190.24
+0.49%
Applied Finance Valuation LgCp ETF
JRE27.81N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF
KRE76.21-0.28
-0.37%
State Street® SPDR® S&PRgnllBkgETF

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
+7.11%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+6.49%
KGC - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+7.88%
WPM - GDX
94%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
+7.16%
PAAS - GDX
92%
Closely correlated
+6.60%
More

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+6.29%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
+6.60%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
CDE - SIL
90%
Closely correlated
+11.12%
OR - SIL
88%
Closely correlated
+2.89%
VZLA - SIL
81%
Closely correlated
+5.95%
More