GDXJ
Price
$132.59
Change
+$3.45 (+2.67%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
9.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGDJ
Price
$101.30
Change
+$2.18 (+2.20%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
377.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs SGDJ

GDXJ vs SGDJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs provide targeted exposure to junior gold and silver mining companies, focusing on smaller-capitalization firms engaged primarily in exploration and early-stage production rather than large-scale producers.
  • VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index with a broader portfolio of approximately 80–120 holdings, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) follows the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index with a more concentrated set of around 30 holdings.
  • Expense ratios are closely aligned, with GDXJ at 0.52% and SGDJ at 0.50%, reflecting modest cost differences in a niche thematic category.
  • GDXJ employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology, whereas SGDJ incorporates custom factors that may include price momentum, leading to potential differences in holdings selection and rebalancing dynamics.
  • Both funds operate as passively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) within the precious metals equity sector, offering investors leveraged exposure to gold price movements through equity securities rather than physical metal or futures contracts.
  • Structural similarities position the ETFs as close alternatives for sector-specific allocation, with differences primarily in diversification breadth and index construction rules.

Introduction

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) offer investors comparable access to the junior segment of the gold mining industry. These ETFs do not compete directly with broad-market or large-cap gold miner products; instead, they serve as specialized vehicles for those seeking higher-risk, higher-reward exposure to smaller mining companies. In the current environment of fluctuating commodity prices and shifting macroeconomic conditions, the pair provides distinct but related pathways to thematic precious metals equity exposure, allowing investors to evaluate trade-offs between portfolio breadth and factor-driven selection.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets small-capitalization companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from gold and/or silver mining, royalties, or streaming activities. The fund typically holds 80–120 securities, providing broad diversification within the junior miners space. Top holdings generally include leading junior producers and developers across global markets. Sector allocation is concentrated in materials, with primary exposure to gold and silver mining equities. The expense ratio stands at 0.52%. As a standard equity ETF, it employs market-capitalization weighting with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. The structure emphasizes liquidity through its listing on major U.S. exchanges and substantial assets under management.

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) Overview

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on small-capitalization gold companies, incorporating custom factors such as price momentum in its selection and weighting process. The fund maintains a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 30 holdings. Top positions typically feature a select group of junior gold explorers and producers. Sector exposure remains centered on materials, particularly gold and silver mining. The expense ratio is 0.50%. Rebalancing follows the index methodology, which may result in more dynamic adjustments based on factor signals. The ETF structure supports efficient trading on U.S. exchanges with a focused approach to the junior miners theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The junior gold miners sector operates within the broader precious metals and materials industry, where company performance is closely tied to gold and silver price trends, exploration success rates, and capital availability for development projects. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and geopolitical developments that influence safe-haven flows into precious metals. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards also play a role. Capital flows into the sector can accelerate during periods of rising metal prices or heightened uncertainty, while risks encompass operational challenges for smaller firms, commodity volatility, and potential dilution from equity financings common among juniors. Both ETFs reflect these dynamics through equity exposure rather than direct commodity holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the two ETFs have exhibited correlated movements driven by underlying gold price fluctuations and sector sentiment, with differences in relative volatility stemming from portfolio concentration and index rules. GDXJ’s broader holdings base may provide smoother exposure across a larger number of junior miners, potentially moderating the impact of individual company events. SGDJ’s factor-based approach and smaller number of holdings can lead to more pronounced responses to momentum shifts among top constituents. Positioning in both funds aligns with investor interest in junior miners during phases of commodity strength or equity market rotation toward cyclical materials sectors, though the concentrated nature of SGDJ may amplify sensitivity to specific holdings performance relative to GDXJ’s diversified construction.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural factors including slightly lower expense ratio, concentrated holdings aligned with custom momentum factors, and comparable thematic exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and factor-driven selection within the junior gold miners space. GDXJ remains a strong alternative for those favoring broader diversification. This assessment reflects observable characteristics rather than short-term signals and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. SGDJ commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a Buy and SGDJ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 9.86B vs. SGDJ (377M). SGDJ has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXJ: SGDJ (20.409) vs GDXJ (16.532). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SGDJ: GDXJ (17 years) vs SGDJ (11 years). SGDJ (0.50) and GDXJ (0.52) have comparable expense ratios . SGDJ has a higher turnover GDXJ (36.00) vs GDXJ (36.00).
GDXJSGDJGDXJ / SGDJ
Gain YTD16.53220.40981%
Net Assets9.86B377M2,616%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.50104%
Turnover36.0076.0047%
Yield2.769.5529%
Fund Existence17 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJSGDJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SGDJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAMFX24.040.17
+0.71%
FAM Small Cap Investor
NMSCX24.870.17
+0.69%
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
EQNRX26.120.14
+0.54%
MFS Equity Income R1
EMAAX18.820.09
+0.48%
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A
ACEKX11.950.03
+0.25%
Invesco Equity and Income R5

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
+2.67%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
FSM - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
CGAU - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
More

SGDJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDJ has been closely correlated with SA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDJ jumps, then SA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGDJ
1D Price
Change %
SGDJ100%
+2.20%
SA - SGDJ
86%
Closely correlated
-9.35%
EQX - SGDJ
85%
Closely correlated
+5.05%
SKE - SGDJ
84%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
DRD - SGDJ
84%
Closely correlated
+4.03%
CDE - SGDJ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
More