GDXJ
Price
$128.80
Change
-$5.99 (-4.44%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
9.76B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$99.14
Change
-$4.00 (-3.88%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
5.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs SIL

GDXJ vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXJ tracks an index of smaller-capitalization (junior) gold and silver mining companies, offering broader diversification with approximately 110-120 holdings compared to SIL’s more concentrated portfolio of roughly 40 silver-focused miners.
  • SIL provides targeted exposure to the silver mining industry through a passive strategy tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while GDXJ follows the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index with emphasis on smaller producers and explorers.
  • Expense ratios differ modestly, with GDXJ at 0.52% and SIL at 0.65%, influencing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking precious metals sector exposure.
  • Both ETFs allocate nearly all assets to basic materials equities and exhibit high volatility tied to commodity prices, yet GDXJ’s junior miner tilt generally implies greater sensitivity to gold price movements and exploration outcomes.
  • Top holdings in GDXJ include a mix of mid-sized gold producers such as Equinox Gold (EQX), Evolution Mining, and Alamos Gold (AGI), whereas SIL’s largest positions feature royalty and streaming companies like Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) alongside major silver producers.
  • These ETFs serve complementary rather than identical roles within precious metals portfolios, with GDXJ suiting investors seeking junior miner leverage and SIL appealing to those prioritizing silver-specific thematic exposure.

Introduction

Investors evaluating precious metals exposure often compare specialized mining ETFs to align portfolios with gold and silver price dynamics. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) both deliver equity exposure to companies involved in precious metals extraction, yet they target distinct segments of the sector. GDXJ emphasizes smaller-capitalization gold and silver miners, while SIL concentrates on silver mining operations. These vehicles do not compete directly but offer alternative pathways within the same thematic universe, allowing investors to fine-tune risk, diversification, and commodity sensitivity according to prevailing market conditions and portfolio objectives.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on small-capitalization companies deriving at least 50% of revenues from gold or silver mining, royalties, or streaming activities. The fund typically holds 110-120 securities, providing diversified access to junior miners primarily domiciled in Canada, Australia, and the United States. Top holdings often include Equinox Gold (EQX), Evolution Mining, Alamos Gold (AGI), Endeavour Mining, and Coeur Mining (CDE). The portfolio maintains nearly full allocation to basic materials equities. GDXJ carries a net expense ratio of 0.52% and employs a rules-based, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing. Its structure suits investors seeking higher-beta exposure to gold price cycles through smaller producers and explorers.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses. The index measures the performance of companies engaged in silver mining worldwide. The fund maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 40 holdings, with significant weightings in royalty and streaming firms alongside primary silver producers. Prominent positions frequently include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Pan American Silver (PAAS), Coeur Mining (CDE), Hecla Mining (HL), and First Majestic Silver (AG). SIL allocates virtually all assets to basic materials and follows a market-capitalization-weighted approach with regular rebalancing. Its net expense ratio stands at 0.65%. The ETF appeals to investors targeting direct silver industry participation with a focus on established producers and related businesses.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector remains influenced by macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments that affect gold and silver demand as stores of value and industrial inputs. Silver benefits additionally from growing applications in solar energy, electronics, and electric vehicles, creating distinct demand drivers compared with gold. Capital flows into mining equities often accelerate during periods of monetary easing or heightened uncertainty, while regulatory changes in key producing regions such as Canada, Mexico, and Australia can impact operational costs and project timelines. Both ETFs operate within a cyclical industry characterized by commodity price volatility, cost pressures, and varying levels of exploration success. Investors monitor broader equity market sentiment and central bank policies for signals on sector rotation into or out of precious metals exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDXJ has demonstrated pronounced sensitivity to gold price fluctuations due to its emphasis on junior miners, which typically carry higher operational leverage and exploration risk. SIL’s performance has reflected silver price movements more directly, with its concentrated holdings amplifying returns during periods of strong silver demand. Over broader timeframes, both ETFs have exhibited elevated volatility relative to broad equity benchmarks, though GDXJ’s larger number of holdings can moderate idiosyncratic company risk compared with SIL’s more concentrated profile. Relative positioning shifts with commodity trends, earnings results from major producers, and shifts in investor appetite for growth-oriented versus income-generating mining equities. SIL’s inclusion of royalty companies may provide some downside cushion during low-price environments, while GDXJ’s junior focus offers greater upside potential in rising commodity cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) due to its lower expense ratio, greater diversification across holdings, and broader exposure to the junior miner segment within the precious metals theme. SIL offers compelling silver-specific focus but carries a higher cost structure and elevated concentration risk. Investors should evaluate both ETFs against their risk tolerance, time horizon, and views on gold versus silver price trajectories.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. SIL commentary
Aug 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a StrongBuy and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 9.76B vs. SIL (5.34B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXJ: SIL (18.866) vs GDXJ (13.201). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SIL: GDXJ (17 years) vs SIL (16 years). GDXJ (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GDXJ has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
GDXJSILGDXJ / SIL
Gain YTD13.20118.86670%
Net Assets9.76B5.34B183%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.6580%
Turnover36.0027.57131%
Yield2.761.38201%
Fund Existence17 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCLR51.55N/A
N/A
Reckoner BBB-B Clo Reinvesting ETF
QNXT32.03-0.41
-1.25%
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
FVC42.25-0.74
-1.72%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5
AMDY42.15-0.86
-2.00%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
ARKG47.64-2.23
-4.47%
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
-4.44%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-3.68%
FSM - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
-4.29%
CGAU - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
More

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
-3.88%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
-3.68%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
OR - SIL
88%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
-3.85%
More