GDXJ
Price
$117.62
Change
+$8.22 (+7.51%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Net Assets
8.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$88.50
Change
+$5.24 (+6.29%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Net Assets
4.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs SIL

GDXJ vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXJ provides targeted exposure to small- and mid-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold mining, with some silver overlap, while SIL focuses exclusively on silver mining firms across a broader capitalization spectrum.
  • GDXJ holds significantly more securities (approximately 114) than SIL (approximately 40), offering greater diversification within the junior gold miners segment.
  • GDXJ carries a lower expense ratio of 0.52% compared to SIL’s 0.65%, which can influence long-term net returns for cost-conscious investors.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track market-capitalization-weighted indices of precious metals miners, but they differ in thematic emphasis—gold juniors versus silver producers—leading to distinct risk and return profiles.
  • GDXJ’s smaller-company focus typically results in higher volatility relative to SIL’s more established silver mining holdings during commodity price cycles.
  • Investors seeking silver-specific exposure may prefer SIL, whereas those targeting higher-growth potential from early-stage gold miners may favor GDXJ.

Introduction

GDXJ and SIL both offer equity exposure to precious metals mining companies, making them relevant for investors seeking commodity-linked returns without direct ownership of physical metals. They do not compete directly but provide differentiated strategies within the same broad sector. GDXJ emphasizes junior gold miners, while SIL targets silver mining operations. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural differences, cost structures, and thematic positioning to align with specific portfolio objectives in the precious metals space.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

The VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on small-capitalization companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue from gold and/or silver mining or have projects with similar potential. The fund typically holds around 114 securities, emphasizing junior and early-stage miners. Its expense ratio stands at 0.52%. GDXJ employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index. This structure delivers concentrated exposure to smaller precious metals producers, distinguishing it through its focus on growth-oriented junior companies.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

The Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses. The index measures the performance of global companies involved in silver mining, exploration, and related activities. SIL generally holds approximately 40 securities, providing exposure across a range of silver-focused firms. Its expense ratio is 0.65%. The fund uses a market-capitalization-weighted approach with regular rebalancing. This setup offers investors direct access to the silver mining segment, with holdings that often include more established producers compared to junior-focused strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector remains influenced by macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and geopolitical developments that affect gold and silver prices. Silver benefits from growing industrial demand in electronics, solar energy, and electric vehicles, while gold serves primarily as a monetary and safe-haven asset. Capital flows into mining equities can accelerate during periods of monetary easing or heightened uncertainty. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards also shape the operating environment for companies in both ETFs. Sector risks include commodity price volatility, operational challenges at mining sites, and currency fluctuations for internationally diversified holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDXJ’s emphasis on smaller gold mining companies has contributed to greater sensitivity to gold price movements and equity market sentiment toward early-stage producers. SIL’s broader silver mining holdings have shown different responsiveness tied to industrial silver demand and established producer earnings. During periods of sector rotation favoring precious metals, relative performance has varied based on the strength of gold versus silver fundamentals. GDXJ typically exhibits higher volatility due to its junior focus, while SIL may demonstrate comparatively steadier behavior linked to larger silver operations. Both ETFs respond to broader commodity trends and macroeconomic shifts, with positioning differences arising from their distinct underlying indices and market-capitalization profiles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like GDXJ or SIL can leverage this platform for efficient discovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to GDXJ due to its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for diversification within the junior segment, and alignment with gold’s established monetary role. SIL offers compelling silver-specific exposure but carries a higher cost structure. The verdict reflects probabilistic assessment of cost efficiency, diversification profile, and thematic momentum rather than any guarantee of future results.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. SIL commentary
Aug 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a StrongBuy and SIL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 8.39B vs. SIL (4.74B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDXJ: SIL (6.109) vs GDXJ (3.375). GDXJ was incepted earlier than SIL: GDXJ (17 years) vs SIL (16 years). GDXJ (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GDXJ has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
GDXJSILGDXJ / SIL
Gain YTD3.3756.10955%
Net Assets8.39B4.74B177%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.6580%
Turnover36.0027.57131%
Yield2.761.38201%
Fund Existence17 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIAX16.030.35
+2.23%
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
JXX32.000.40
+1.26%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF
JPIN77.000.88
+1.15%
JPMorgan Diversified Return Intl Eq ETF
LTTI17.580.04
+0.23%
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
KBE69.97-0.18
-0.26%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Bank ETF

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
+7.51%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+7.88%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+6.60%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
+6.49%
CGAU - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
+7.22%
AGI - GDXJ
89%
Closely correlated
+6.59%
More

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+6.29%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
+6.60%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
CDE - SIL
90%
Closely correlated
+11.12%
OR - SIL
88%
Closely correlated
+2.89%
VZLA - SIL
81%
Closely correlated
+5.95%
More