GEM
Price
$49.08
Change
-$3.41 (-6.50%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
1.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VWO
Price
$58.03
Change
-$2.28 (-3.78%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
162.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GEM vs VWO

Header iconGEM vs VWO Comparison
Open Charts GEM vs VWOBanner chart's image
GEM vs VWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) vs. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)

Key Takeaways

  • GEM employs a multi-factor strategy targeting value, momentum, quality, and low volatility, while VWO provides broad market-cap-weighted exposure to emerging markets.
  • GEM has approximately 750 holdings with top 10 at 36%, compared to VWO's over 5,000 holdings and top 10 at 27%, offering GEM higher concentration but factor-driven selection.
  • Both heavily weight technology (GEM 37%, VWO 26%), but GEM shows elevated exposure to South Korea (20%), absent in VWO due to FTSE classification as developed.
  • VWO boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.06% versus GEM's 0.35%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term holders.
  • GEM has demonstrated stronger relative performance in recent market cycles, driven by factor tilts toward high-momentum tech names in Taiwan and South Korea.
  • VWO offers superior liquidity with massive AUM over $120B and high daily volume, ideal for large investors.

Introduction

Investors seeking emerging markets exposure often weigh factor-based strategies against broad indexing amid shifting global capital flows. GEM and VWO both target equities in high-growth regions like Asia, but diverge structurally: GEM uses a smart-beta approach to overweight resilient factors, while VWO delivers comprehensive diversification across thousands of stocks. This comparison is timely as emerging markets benefit from AI-driven demand for semiconductors, a weaker U.S. dollar, and rotation from U.S. equities. They serve similar goals of capturing EM growth but differ in risk profiles, costs, and sensitivities to country classifications—such as South Korea's debated EM status—making them alternatives rather than direct substitutes.

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) Overview

The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index, a multi-factor benchmark emphasizing value, momentum, quality (profitability), and low volatility. Launched in 2015, it holds around 750 stocks, with the top 10 comprising 36% of assets, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (14%), Samsung Electronics (7%), and SK Hynix (5%). Sector allocations tilt toward technology (37%), financial services (21%), and consumer cyclical (9%). Country weights feature Taiwan (24%), South Korea (20%), China (20%), and India (11%). The expense ratio is 0.35%. As a passive smart-beta ETF, it rebalances quarterly to maintain equal factor weights, aiming for superior risk-adjusted returns over cap-weighted peers. GEM's factor overlay distinguishes it, potentially enhancing resilience in volatile EM cycles.

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) tracks the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, providing market-cap-weighted exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks across emerging economies. With over 5,000 holdings since its 2005 inception, it emphasizes breadth, with top 10 at 27% including Taiwan Semiconductor (13%), Tencent (4%), and Alibaba (3%). Sectors break down to technology (26%), financial services (21%), and consumer cyclical (11%). Key countries are China (26-32%), Taiwan (25%), India (15-20%), and Brazil (4%), excluding South Korea per FTSE's developed market classification. Expense ratio stands at a low 0.06%. As a fully passive fund, it rebalances periodically to mirror the index, prioritizing low costs and diversification for core EM allocation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets face a dynamic environment with macroeconomic tailwinds like anticipated U.S. rate cuts boosting capital flows—EM ETFs saw $35B inflows early 2026 before geopolitical tensions in the Middle East tempered risk appetite. AI and semiconductor demand propel Taiwan and South Korea, key for both ETFs, amid robust EM earnings growth projected at 3.3-3.4% GDP. China stimulus aids A-share inclusion, but regulatory risks linger. Sector rotation favors tech over commodities, with EM debt recovering on liquidity. Volatility stems from U.S. growth slowdowns impacting exports, trade tensions, and dollar strength. Geopolitical flashpoints and election cycles add uncertainty, yet attractive valuations versus developed markets sustain appeal.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, GEM has outperformed VWO, with YTD gains around 18-23% versus VWO's 12-13%, and 1-year returns near 52% against 33-35%. This edge ties to GEM's factor tilts amplifying momentum in South Korean memory chips (SK Hynix, Samsung) and Taiwanese semis, fueled by AI demand. VWO's broader base and zero Korea exposure muted gains amid China underperformance. Volatility profiles show GEM slightly higher due to concentration, but factors like low-vol provide downside buffers in risk-off periods. Relative positioning favors GEM in tech-led cycles, while VWO shines in diversified recoveries, influenced by interest rate paths and commodity trends.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including ETF comparisons like GEM and VWO. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in emerging markets.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors GEM due to its structural advantages in factor-driven outperformance, stronger trend consistency in tech momentum, and balanced risk exposure via multi-factor design. While VWO excels in cost efficiency and diversification, GEM's probabilistic edge in recent cycles—tied to sector momentum and South Korea tilt—positions it ahead amid AI tailwinds, though with higher fees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GEM vs. VWO commentary
Jun 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEM is a Hold and VWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWO has more net assets: 163B vs. GEM (1.64B). GEM has a higher annual dividend yield than VWO: GEM (17.924) vs VWO (7.943). GEM was incepted earlier than VWO: GEM (11 years) vs VWO (21 years). VWO (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than GEM (0.35). GEM has a higher turnover VWO (6.00) vs VWO (6.00).
GEMVWOGEM / VWO
Gain YTD17.9247.943226%
Net Assets1.64B163B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.06583%
Turnover32.006.00533%
Yield1.852.4376%
Fund Existence11 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GEMVWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRPZ29.58N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF
QVAL55.48-0.48
-0.86%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF
FLLA26.44-0.65
-2.42%
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
XOMX42.50-1.30
-2.98%
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
URA45.31-4.97
-9.88%
Global X Uranium ETF

GEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEM
1D Price
Change %
GEM100%
-6.50%
BABA - GEM
73%
Closely correlated
-3.88%
JD - GEM
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
BILI - GEM
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.05%
BIDU - GEM
62%
Loosely correlated
-9.75%
BZUN - GEM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More

VWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWO has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VWO jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VWO
1D Price
Change %
VWO100%
-3.78%
JD - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
BILI - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
-3.05%
BIDU - VWO
68%
Closely correlated
-9.75%
BABA - VWO
67%
Closely correlated
-3.88%
BZ - VWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
More