Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs HGOSX
GFACX vs HGOSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HGOSX
GFACX vs HGOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HGOSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HGOSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. HGOSX (6.73B). GFACX (0.00) and HGOSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HGOSX: GFACX (26 years) vs HGOSX (20 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than HGOSX (1.13). HGOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). HGOSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: HGOSX (0) vs GFACX (250). HGOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.92 vs. GFACX (-2.39). HGOSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| GFACX | HGOSX | GFACX / HGOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.13 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.13 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 7.297 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.73B | 5,246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 0.92 | -259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 76.44 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | 11.16 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 89.24 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement