Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MRFGX
GFACX vs MRFGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MRFGX
GFACX vs MRFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MRFGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MRFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MRFGX (3.91B). GFACX (0.00) and MRFGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MRFGX: GFACX (25 years) vs MRFGX (16 years). GFACX (1.35) and MRFGX (1.33) have similar cost to investors . GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MRFGX (29.00). MRFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: MRFGX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. MRFGX (-7.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 9.24 vs. MRFGX (-27.21).
| GFACX | MRFGX | GFACX / MRFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.17 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.33 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.336 | 11.310 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.91B | 9,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | -7.06 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | 10.99 | 362% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.24 | -27.21 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.48 | 25.16 | 368% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement