Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGYX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WLGYX (6.31B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGYX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFACX (26 years) vs WLGYX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WLGYX (0.98). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGYX (24.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. WLGYX (-3.30). WLGYX return over 5 years is better than : 7.08 vs. GFACX (4.29).
| GFACX | WLGYX | GFACX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.98 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.990 | 2.798 | 321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.31B | 5,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.03 | -3.30 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 32.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.29 | 7.08 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.74 | 111.23 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement