Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGYX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WLGYX (6.16B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGYX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFACX (25 years) vs WLGYX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WLGYX (0.97). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. WLGYX (-3.95). WLGYX return over 5 years is better than : 10.84 vs. GFACX (8.16).
| GFACX | WLGYX | GFACX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.97 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.958 | -3.452 | -173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.16B | 5,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | -3.95 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.00 | 28.96 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.16 | 10.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.65 | 104.77 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers