Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.73
Change-$0.27 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.51
Change-$0.24 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.91B
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGYX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WLGYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WLGYX (7.91B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGYX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFACX (25 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WLGYX (0.97). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. WLGYX (6.44). WLGYX return over 5 years is better than : 32.99 vs. GFACX (30.40).
| GFACX | WLGYX | GFACX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.97 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.205 | 6.718 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 7.91B | 4,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 6.44 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.52 | 65.75 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 32.99 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.81 | 107.74 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement