Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.33
Change-$0.21 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGYX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WLGYX (8.01B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGYX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFACX (25 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WLGYX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. WLGYX (12.03). WLGYX return over 5 years is better than : 34.93 vs. GFACX (32.72).
| GFACX | WLGYX | GFACX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 6.243 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 8.01B | 4,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 12.03 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 48.16 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 34.93 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | 110.38 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement