Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLSX
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.69
Change-$1.70 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.02B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$52.50
Change-$1.63 (-3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.66B
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLSX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LGLSX (7.66B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. GFAFX (4.49). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.43 vs. LGLSX (18.45).
| GFAFX | LGLSX | GFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.463 | 14.537 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 7.66B | 4,294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | 14.25 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.33 | 110.05 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.43 | 18.45 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.51 | 126.11 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement