Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLSX
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.50
Change-$2.68 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$39.27
Change-$1.74 (-4.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
GFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. LGLSX (5.97B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. GFAFX (-2.11). LGLSX (52.85) and GFAFX (50.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLSX | GFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.565 | -13.225 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 5.97B | 4,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | 7.30 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.06 | 24.54 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.80 | 52.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.18 | N/A | - |