Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGRNX
GFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.02
Change+$0.96 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.42B
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$33.33
Change+$0.30 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.77B
GFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGRNX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 331B vs. LGRNX (17.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGRNX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGRNX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGRNX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGRNX (13 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than LGRNX (0.57). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: GFAFX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.93 vs. GFAFX (7.42). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. GFAFX (33.34).
| GFAFX | LGRNX | GFAFX / LGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.977 | 12.374 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331B | 17.8B | 1,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 7.93 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.02 | 68.33 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.34 | 41.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.35 | 187.32 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement