Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SGRHX
GFAFX vs SGRHX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SGRHX
GFAFX vs SGRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SGRHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SGRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. SGRHX (3.09B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SGRHX: GFAFX (0.20) vs SGRHX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SGRHX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SGRHX (11 years). SGRHX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). SGRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). SGRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: SGRHX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. SGRHX (-5.62). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.04 vs. SGRHX (-27.46).
| GFAFX | SGRHX | GFAFX / SGRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.76 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.581 | 4.503 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.09B | 11,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | -5.62 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.57 | 9.13 | 488% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | -27.46 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.81 | -2.14 | -5,082% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement