Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WPASX
GFAFX vs WPASX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPASX
GFAFX vs WPASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPASX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WPASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WPASX (473M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPASX: GFAFX (0.20) vs WPASX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPASX: GFAFX (25 years) vs WPASX (12 years). WPASX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPASX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPASX: GFAFX (250) vs WPASX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. WPASX (-9.63). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. WPASX (-17.07).
| GFAFX | WPASX | GFAFX / WPASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | -5.447 | -160% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 473M | 76,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -9.63 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 1.36 | 3,543% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.91 | -17.07 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.77 | 85.66 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers