GFI
Price
$40.27
Change
-$3.84 (-8.71%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
39.71B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGC
Price
$28.38
Change
-$2.51 (-8.13%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
34B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFI vs KGC

Header iconGFI vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts GFI vs KGCBanner chart's image
GFI vs KGC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gold Fields Limited (GFI) vs. Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both GFI and KGC have delivered strong one-year returns exceeding 100%, driven by elevated gold prices and operational efficiencies.
  • GFI trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 10.68 compared to KGC's 12.57, suggesting relatively better valuation.
  • KGC reported record Q1 free cash flow (FCF) of approximately $840 million, highlighting superior cash generation in recent market activity.
  • GFI boasts higher profit margins at 40.76% versus KGC's 35.99%, with recent analyst upgrades boosting sentiment.
  • Both stocks exhibit robust quarterly revenue growth—GFI at 71% and KGC at 61% year-over-year—amid favorable gold sector dynamics.
  • GFI has a lower beta of 0.82, indicating less volatility than KGC's 1.37.

Introduction

Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) are prominent gold mining companies whose stocks have benefited from sustained gold price strength and operational improvements. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning, offering insights for investors tracking the precious metals sector. Traders seeking exposure to gold amid economic uncertainty, inflation concerns, and geopolitical tensions may find value in evaluating relative momentum, valuations, and risk profiles between these two producers. With both delivering triple-digit one-year gains, the focus is on which stock shows stronger trend consistency in the current environment.

GFI Overview and Recent Performance

Gold Fields Limited (GFI), a South Africa-headquartered gold producer, operates mines across Australia, South America, and West Africa. The company has emphasized cost discipline and production growth, contributing to a profit margin of 40.76% and return on equity of 51.93%. In recent market activity, GFI has shown resilience with a one-year return of over 103%, though year-to-date gains lag at 0.81%. Key influences include strong fiscal 2025 results with revenue up 68% year-over-year and significant EPS growth, alongside analyst upgrades from Canaccord to Buy and Morgan Stanley to Equal Weight. Strategic investments in junior explorers like Founders Metals have enhanced growth prospects, supporting positive sentiment despite gold price fluctuations.

KGC Overview and Recent Performance

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC), based in Canada, focuses on mines in the Americas, West Africa, and other regions, prioritizing low-cost production and capital returns. It reported an operating margin of 55.09% and debt-to-equity ratio of 8.20%. Recent performance features a one-year return of about 109% and year-to-date advance of 3.41%, reflecting robust gold leverage. In recent weeks, Q1 results showcased record free cash flow near $840 million, net earnings doubling year-over-year, and revenue growth of 61%, despite a post-earnings pullback. Shareholder returns via dividends and buybacks, coupled with maintained Buy ratings, have driven sentiment amid high gold realizations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for their adaptability to current market volatility in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots showcase win rates from 51% to 88%, with annualized returns ranging from 24% to 163%, across timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts. Strategies vary from trend-following in semiconductors and AI infrastructure to leveraged ETFs, small caps, and gold miners, often using take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors for risk management. Gold miner-focused bots have delivered 57-61% returns with over 56% win rates, suiting precious metals momentum. Explore these bots to identify those aligning with your trading style and enhance performance in dynamic conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both GFI and KGC operate as pure-play gold producers, but GFI emphasizes South American and Australian assets for diversification, while KGC leverages North and South American operations for lower geopolitical risk. Growth drivers include high quarterly revenue and EPS expansion for both, though GFI edges in margins and KGC in FCF. Recent momentum favors KGC with superior YTD gains and cash returns, versus GFI's valuation appeal via lower P/E and forward multiples. Risk factors differ: GFI's higher debt/equity (37%) contrasts KGC's conservative 8%, but GFI offers lower beta for stability. Market sentiment is bullish across the board, tied to gold's safe-haven status, with trade-offs in volatility versus cash flow strength.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward KGC due to its exceptional free cash flow trajectory, accelerated shareholder distributions, and relative outperformance in recent quarters amid gold strength. Factors like lower debt levels and high operating margins position it favorably for sustained upside, though GFI remains competitive with superior profitability and analyst support. This probabilistic edge reflects trend consistency rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
GFI vs. KGC commentary
May 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFI is a Hold and KGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2026
Stock price -- (GFI: $40.27 vs. KGC: $28.38)
Brand notoriety: GFI and KGC are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFI: 130% vs. KGC: 95%
Market capitalization -- GFI: $39.71B vs. KGC: $34B
GFI [@Precious Metals] is valued at $39.71B. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GFI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than GFI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFI is a better buy in the short-term than KGC.

Price Growth

GFI (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.23% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFI is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2026.

KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFI($39.7B) has a higher market cap than KGC($34B). KGC has higher P/E ratio than GFI: KGC (12.08) vs GFI (10.22). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 0.904 vs. GFI (-5.078). GFI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.34B vs. KGC (5.15B). KGC has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. GFI (1.78B). KGC has less debt than GFI: KGC (738M) vs GFI (3.22B). GFI has higher revenues than KGC: GFI (8.75B) vs KGC (7.96B).
GFIKGCGFI / KGC
Capitalization39.7B34B117%
EBITDA6.34B5.15B123%
Gain YTD-5.0780.904-562%
P/E Ratio10.2212.0885%
Revenue8.75B7.96B110%
Total Cash1.78B2.19B81%
Total Debt3.22B738M436%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFI vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
GFI
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5356
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3326
SMR RATING
1..100
2127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8164
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFI's Valuation (4) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (20). This means that GFI’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (33). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.

GFI's SMR Rating (21) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (27). This means that GFI’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (47). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (81). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFIKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISTB48.13-0.11
-0.23%
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
XFIV48.37-0.28
-0.57%
BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF
IJUN30.59-0.19
-0.61%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Jun
VGI7.37-0.06
-0.81%
VIRTUS GLOBAL MULTI-SECTOR Income FUND
RSMC27.54-0.54
-1.94%
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF

GFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFI has been closely correlated with AU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFI jumps, then AU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFI
1D Price
Change %
GFI100%
-8.71%
AU - GFI
90%
Closely correlated
-9.63%
KGC - GFI
87%
Closely correlated
-8.13%
HMY - GFI
85%
Closely correlated
-9.56%
WPM - GFI
84%
Closely correlated
-6.36%
NEM - GFI
83%
Closely correlated
-6.25%
More