GFS
Price
$37.73
Change
+$0.22 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
20.93B
66 days until earnings call
SLAB
Price
$126.60
Change
+$2.65 (+2.14%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs SLAB

Header iconGFS vs SLAB Comparison
Open Charts GFS vs SLABBanner chart's image
GlobalFoundries
Price$37.73
Change+$0.22 (+0.59%)
Volume$1.02M
Capitalization20.93B
Silicon Laboratories
Price$126.60
Change+$2.65 (+2.14%)
Volume$308.31K
Capitalization4.12B
GFS vs SLAB Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFS vs. SLAB commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Hold and SLAB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GFS: $37.73 vs. SLAB: $126.60)
Brand notoriety: GFS and SLAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 54% vs. SLAB: 72%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $20.93B vs. SLAB: $4.12B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $20.93B. SLAB’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $54.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLAB is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLAB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the short-term than SLAB.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а +5.39% price change this week, while SLAB (@Semiconductors) price change was +5.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

SLAB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.21% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($20.9B) has a higher market cap than SLAB($4.12B). SLAB YTD gains are higher at: 1.916 vs. GFS (-12.072). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. SLAB (-104.92M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. SLAB (382M). SLAB has less debt than GFS: SLAB (15.5M) vs GFS (1.63B). GFS has higher revenues than SLAB: GFS (6.79B) vs SLAB (584M).
GFSSLABGFS / SLAB
Capitalization20.9B4.12B507%
EBITDA1.47B-104.92M-1,399%
Gain YTD-12.0721.916-630%
P/E Ratio28.59N/A-
Revenue6.79B584M1,162%
Total Cash2.9B382M758%
Total Debt1.63B15.5M10,523%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLAB: Fundamental Ratings
SLAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSSLAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLQL61.180.54
+0.89%
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
EZA53.94-0.09
-0.17%
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
FPXI54.16-0.30
-0.55%
First Trust International Eq Opps ETF
ENO21.69-0.22
-1.00%
Entergy New Orleans LLC
AAPD17.72-0.27
-1.50%
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then ON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
+0.59%
ON - GFS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
SLAB - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
KLIC - GFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
NXPI - GFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
ADI - GFS
68%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
More

SLAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAB has been closely correlated with POWI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLAB jumps, then POWI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAB
1D Price
Change %
SLAB100%
+2.14%
POWI - SLAB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
ADI - SLAB
79%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
NXPI - SLAB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
KLIC - SLAB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
MCHP - SLAB
77%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
More