Advertisement
FORM vs GFS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs. GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) has delivered superior year-to-date gains of about 146%, outpacing GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS)'s 86% amid semiconductor sector strength.
- FORM's smaller $10.7 billion market cap suggests higher growth potential compared to GFS's larger $35.6 billion valuation.
- Both stocks benefit from AI-driven demand in semiconductors, but FORM focuses on testing solutions while GFS emphasizes foundry manufacturing.
- FORM recently reported strong Q1 earnings with record revenue, though shares pulled back in recent weeks; GFS eyes recoveries in automotive and defense sectors.
- FORM trades at a premium P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 158 versus GFS's 41, reflecting divergent growth expectations.
Introduction
In the dynamic semiconductor industry, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) offer contrasting investment opportunities. FORM specializes in advanced testing equipment essential for complex chips, while GFS operates as a leading contract foundry producing semiconductors. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for traders and investors tracking AI infrastructure growth, sector rotations, and relative performance in a market favoring chip-related plays. Understanding their business models, recent momentum, and positioning aids informed decision-making amid ongoing supply chain shifts.
FORM Overview and Recent Performance
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) designs and manufactures probe cards, analytical probes, and test systems critical for semiconductor testing, particularly in high-performance computing and AI applications. The company has experienced robust stock momentum in recent months, with year-to-date returns exceeding 146% and one-year gains over 370%, driven by surging demand for advanced node testing. Recent quarters highlighted record revenue in Q1 2026, fueled by AI tailwinds and strong margins, prompting a sharp post-earnings rally. However, sentiment has shifted with a notable pullback in recent weeks amid profit-taking and broader market volatility, reflecting the stock's beta of 1.33 (a measure of volatility relative to the market). Key influences include expanding AI chip complexity and partnerships in semiconductor equipment.
GFS Overview and Recent Performance
GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) is a pure-play semiconductor foundry, manufacturing chips for clients in automotive, aerospace, defense, and communications without designing its own. Shares have posted solid year-to-date gains of around 86% and one-year returns of 85%, supported by a market cap of $35.6 billion and steady profitability. In recent market activity, the company has signaled broad recoveries across end-markets like automotive and defense, bolstering investor confidence ahead of Q1 earnings. With a P/E ratio of 41 and beta of 1.71, GFS exhibits resilience but faces cyclical pressures from capacity utilization and client diversification. Performance reflects stabilizing demand outside leading-edge AI nodes.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 elite AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from short-term signal agents to longer-term virtual portfolios with risk controls—tailored to current conditions like semiconductor booms and volatility plays. Top performers display impressive stats, including annualized returns up to 163%, win rates of 57-75%, profit factors exceeding 3.0, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 10 in some cases, with average trade durations from 2 days to weeks. Notably, FORM features in a high-performing semiconductor bot alongside peers like LRCX and KLAC. Explore these bots to potentially enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FORM and GFS both thrive in the semiconductor ecosystem but diverge in business models: FORM provides specialized testing gear with high margins tied to AI chip volumes, while GFS focuses on foundry production for mature nodes in diversified sectors like autos and defense. Growth drivers contrast sharply—FORM leverages explosive AI testing needs, versus GFS's emphasis on industrial recoveries. Recent momentum favors FORM's outsized gains, though its elevated P/E signals valuation risks; GFS offers relative stability with lower multiples. Risk factors include FORM's smaller scale and higher cyclicality versus GFS's debt and capacity dependencies. Market sentiment tilts toward AI pure-plays like FORM, but GFS provides broader sector exposure.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors FORM with higher probability for near-term upside, based on trend consistency, recent earnings catalysts in AI testing, and superior relative momentum positioning. While GFS maintains stability and diversification, FORM's alignment with high-growth chip complexity offers stronger observable tailwinds in the prevailing market environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORM is a Hold and GFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FORM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FORM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +131.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+0.42% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-0.05% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| FORM | GFS | FORM / GFS | |
| Capitalization | 12.2B | 49.2B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 2.26B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 180.853 | 156.787 | 115% |
| P/E Ratio | 180.07 | 51.10 | 352% |
| Revenue | 840M | 6.84B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 303M | 3.07B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 31.9M | 1.72B | 2% |
FORM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FORM | GFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 14 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
FORM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORM | 100% | +4.75% | ||
| RMBS - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| SLAB - FORM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.00% | ||
| ADI - FORM | 72% Closely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| ARM - FORM | 72% Closely correlated | -7.22% | ||
| QCOM - FORM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||