FORM
Price
$106.20
Change
+$0.82 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
8.28B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFS
Price
$49.73
Change
-$0.27 (-0.54%)
Updated
Aug 3, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.43B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORM vs GFS

FORM vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FORM vs. GFS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORM is a Hold and GFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FORM: $106.20 vs. GFS: $49.99)
Brand notoriety: FORM and GFS are both not notable
FORM represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while GFS is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORM: 54% vs. GFS: 79%
Market capitalization -- FORM: $8.28B vs. GFS: $27.43B
FORM [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $8.28B. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $27.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $634.77B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.86T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $62.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $176.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FORM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FORM and GFS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORM is a better buy in the short-term than GFS.

Price Growth

FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -21.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

FORM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-2.84% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-1.28% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($27.4B) has a higher market cap than FORM($8.28B). FORM has higher P/E ratio than GFS: FORM (73.24) vs GFS (35.96). FORM YTD gains are higher at: 90.391 vs. GFS (43.362). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.4B vs. FORM (128M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. FORM (303M). FORM has less debt than GFS: FORM (31.9M) vs GFS (1.72B). GFS has higher revenues than FORM: GFS (6.77B) vs FORM (840M).
FORMGFSFORM / GFS
Capitalization8.28B27.4B30%
EBITDA128M2.4B5%
Gain YTD90.39143.362208%
P/E Ratio73.2435.96204%
Revenue840M6.77B12%
Total Cash303M1.81B17%
Total Debt31.9M1.72B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FORM: Fundamental Ratings
FORM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORMGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLZE13.721.09
+8.63%
Backblaze
ACLS130.385.17
+4.13%
Axcelis Technologies
VEEV203.782.22
+1.10%
Veeva Systems
HCAT2.090.01
+0.48%
Health Catalyst
KXIN5.30N/A
N/A
Kaixin Holdings

FORM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORM
1D Price
Change %
FORM100%
+0.78%
ONTO - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
RMBS - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
AMAT - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
SLAB - FORM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
ADI - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More