It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GGB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKIROY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GGB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIROY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
GGB (@Steel) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while KIROY (@Steel) price change was -7.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -4.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.04%.
GGB is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
KIROY is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
GGB | KIROY | GGB / KIROY | |
Capitalization | 6.63B | 5.91B | 112% |
EBITDA | 9.7B | 36.9B | 26% |
Gain YTD | -14.699 | -38.700 | 38% |
P/E Ratio | 8.28 | 5.13 | 161% |
Revenue | 64.9B | 83.8B | 77% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
GGB | KIROY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KIROY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GGB (6) in the Steel industry. This means that KIROY’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.
GGB's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Steel industry is in the same range as KIROY (78) in the null industry. This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to KIROY’s over the last 12 months.
KIROY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGB (60) in the Steel industry. This means that KIROY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGB’s over the last 12 months.
GGB's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Steel industry is in the same range as KIROY (60) in the null industry. This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to KIROY’s over the last 12 months.
GGB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for KIROY (90) in the null industry. This means that GGB’s stock grew significantly faster than KIROY’s over the last 12 months.
GGB | KIROY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago71% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago75% | 8 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 23 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
EIS | 77.28 | 1.09 | +1.43% |
iShares MSCI Israel ETF | |||
XDJL | 35.13 | -0.06 | -0.16% |
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd ETF Jul | |||
QAI | 32.45 | -0.09 | -0.28% |
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | |||
DYTA | 31.67 | -0.20 | -0.62% |
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | |||
GUNR | 37.58 | -0.30 | -0.79% |
FlexShares Mstar Glbl Upstrm Nat Res ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KIROY and SID have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KIROY and SID's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KIROY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KIROY | 100% | -6.82% | ||
SID - KIROY | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
GGB - KIROY | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
MT - KIROY | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
CLF - KIROY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
CMC - KIROY | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
More |