GGB
Price
$2.83
Change
+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.64B
32 days until earnings call
MT
Price
$23.26
Change
+$0.08 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.15B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GGB vs MT

Header iconGGB vs MT Comparison
Open Charts GGB vs MTBanner chart's image
Gerdau SA
Price$2.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Volume$15.2M
Capitalization5.64B
ArcelorMittal
Price$23.26
Change+$0.08 (+0.35%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization18.15B
GGB vs MT Comparison Chart
Loading...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGB vs. MT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGB is a Hold and MT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GGB: $2.83 vs. MT: $23.26)
Brand notoriety: GGB: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGB: 142% vs. MT: 113%
Market capitalization -- GGB: $5.64B vs. MT: $18.15B
GGB [@Steel] is valued at $5.64B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $18.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $29.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the long-term than GGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGB is a better buy in the short-term than MT.

Price Growth

GGB (@Steel) experienced а +4.04% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

MT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.98% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($18.1B) has a higher market cap than GGB($5.64B). MT has higher P/E ratio than GGB: MT (22.08) vs GGB (7.51). MT YTD gains are higher at: 0.562 vs. GGB (-1.736). GGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.7B vs. MT (2.45B). GGB has more cash in the bank: 8.83B vs. MT (5.09B). MT has less debt than GGB: MT (11.3B) vs GGB (13.8B). GGB (64.9B) and MT (62.3B) have equivalent revenues.
GGBMTGGB / MT
Capitalization5.64B18.1B31%
EBITDA9.7B2.45B397%
Gain YTD-1.7360.562-309%
P/E Ratio7.5122.0834%
Revenue64.9B62.3B104%
Total Cash8.83B5.09B173%
Total Debt13.8B11.3B122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGB vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
GGB
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
195
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8060
SMR RATING
1..100
6199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
173
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGB's Valuation (6) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (12). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (80). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's SMR Rating (61) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (99). This means that GGB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (81). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

MT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (17). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGBMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGRW31.051.15
+3.83%
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
AHLT24.550.29
+1.20%
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF
EMLP37.580.10
+0.27%
First Trust North Amer Engy InfrasETF
FLTW47.320.08
+0.17%
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
APMU24.670.03
+0.12%
ActivePassive Intermediate Mcpl Bd ETF

GGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGB
1D Price
Change %
GGB100%
+0.35%
SID - GGB
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
TX - GGB
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
MT - GGB
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CMC - GGB
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
ATI - GGB
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with CLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then CLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
+0.35%
CLF - MT
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
SID - MT
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
GGB - MT
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
ATI - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
TX - MT
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More