GGB
Price
$2.88
Change
-$0.04 (-1.37%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.8B
25 days until earnings call
MT
Price
$29.07
Change
+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
22.41B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GGB vs MT

Header iconGGB vs MT Comparison
Open Charts GGB vs MTBanner chart's image
Gerdau SA
Price$2.88
Change-$0.04 (-1.37%)
Volume$66.37K
Capitalization5.8B
ArcelorMittal
Price$29.07
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Volume$1M
Capitalization22.41B
GGB vs MT Comparison Chart
Loading...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGB vs. MT commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGB is a Hold and MT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GGB: $2.92 vs. MT: $29.07)
Brand notoriety: GGB: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGB: 125% vs. MT: 38%
Market capitalization -- GGB: $5.8B vs. MT: $22.41B
GGB [@Steel] is valued at $5.8B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $22.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $28.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the long-term than GGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the short-term than GGB.

Price Growth

GGB (@Steel) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was -5.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

MT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-2.04% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($22.4B) has a higher market cap than GGB($5.8B). MT has higher P/E ratio than GGB: MT (17.20) vs GGB (7.51). MT YTD gains are higher at: 25.681 vs. GGB (0.249). GGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.39B vs. MT (6.06B). GGB has more cash in the bank: 8.28B vs. MT (6.4B). MT has less debt than GGB: MT (11.6B) vs GGB (14.9B). GGB has higher revenues than MT: GGB (67B) vs MT (62.4B).
GGBMTGGB / MT
Capitalization5.8B22.4B26%
EBITDA9.39B6.06B155%
Gain YTD0.24925.6811%
P/E Ratio7.5117.2044%
Revenue67B62.4B107%
Total Cash8.28B6.4B129%
Total Debt14.9B11.6B128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGB vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
GGB
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8282
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5534
SMR RATING
1..100
7498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
42n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGB's Valuation (5) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (13). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (55). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's SMR Rating (74) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (98). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (59). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MT (84). This means that GGB’s stock grew significantly faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGBMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEEP4.400.09
+2.09%
Mobile Infrastructure Corp
BOH69.501.03
+1.50%
Bank of Hawaii Corp
AFG132.120.01
+0.01%
American Financial Group
WLDN40.77-0.06
-0.15%
Willdan Group
ASNS0.72-0.02
-2.98%
Actelis Networks

GGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGB
1D Price
Change %
GGB100%
-1.71%
SID - GGB
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.19%
CMC - GGB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
NUE - GGB
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
TX - GGB
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
STLD - GGB
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
More